When the Cleveland suburb of Euclid first zoned its land in 1922, the Ambler Realty Company was left with a sizable tract it could no longer sell for industrial use-and so the company sued. What emerged was the seminal zoning case in American history, pitting reformers against private property advocates in the Supreme Court and raising the question of whether a municipality could deny property owners the right to use their land however they chose.
Reconstructing the case that made zoning a central element in urban planning for cities and towns throughout America, Michael Allan Wolf provides the first book-length study of the Supreme Court's landmark Euclid v. Ambler decision. Wolf describes how the ordinance, and the defense of it, burst onto the national stage and became the focus of litigation before moving all the way to the nation's highest court. He subsequently reveals how and why Justice George Sutherland broke from the Court's conservative bloc to support the urban reform movement eager to protect residential neighborhoods from disturbances created by rapidly expanding commercial, industrial, or multifamily uses of land. Following that decision, America saw the rapid proliferation of zoning ordinances, which greatly increased the power of local government to control and rationalize urban planning.
As Wolf attests, many of today's environmental and land use laws might not have been deemed legal had Euclid v. Ambler been decided differently. But he also points out the potential dangers that emerged from the decision, such as its anticompetitive impact on the real estate market, its catalyzing effect on suburban sprawl, and its establishment of a legal basis for excluding minority groups from neighborhoods.
Wolf's compelling account makes it clear that Euclid v. Ambler fundamentally altered how we think about the urban landscape, changed the way our cities and suburbs are organized, and left a long shadow over subsequent cases such as the controversial Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. New London (2005).
... Reginald 184 McKibbin , R. 65 , 217 , 247 , 272 , 273 , 284 Mackintosh , Alphonso 162 Macmillan , Harold 298-9 mains ( dicing game ) 21 managers 200-5 , 400 Masterman , C. E. G. 183 match betting 218 Matthews , Charles 180 Matthews ...
Mark A. Graber, Howard Gillman ... 2 In an introduction to a work subtitled Lessons from the Confederate Constitution that rarely refers to slaves or slavery, Marshall L. DeRosa declares, “the model of government embodied in the CSA ...
12. 1807 Yours of the 3d . Int has been duly received . " The opinions which you give touching the case of Lee & Coulson have been always mine , ever since I examined the case . I now enclose you a Copy of Murdocks deposition .
196. Id. at 813-16 (Scalia, J., dissenting) (citing Romero v. Int'l Terminal Operating Co., 358 U.S. 354 (1959); Lauritzen v. Larsen, 345 U.S. 571 (1953); Murray v. Schooner Charming Betsy, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch64)(l804)). 197. Id. at 8 1 7.
页末的这幅图片描绘了一个断头台的早期原型,名为“福尔布雷特”(字面意思是“下落的木板”)。在这个刑具中,没有锋利的(甚或金属的)刀片,通过迅速一击来使身首分离;相反,这个刑具只是由几块结实的橡木板构成。在锤击的作用下,厚钝的木板边缘可以砸烂受害者的 ...
1962年9月,美国司法部长罗伯特•肯尼迪主持召开“毒品滥用白宫会议”,开始从公众健康导向角度思考吸毒问题,尝试进行毒品贩卖者和毒品成瘾者之间的区分。1965年3月8日,约翰逊总统批准了《1965年药品滥用管制修正案》,对危险药品的非法使用进行严格管制, ...
Trial of the Chicago Eight (or Chicago Seven).
Papers of John Marshall: Vol. II: Correspondence and Papers, July 1788-December 1795, and Account Book, July 1788-December 1795
In its determination to preserve the century of revolution, Gale initiated a revolution of its own: digitization of epic proportions to preserve these invaluable works in the largest archive of its kind.
本书对古典私权一般理论的发展历程进行深入考察,包括考察其思想根源——盛行于17世纪末期至18世纪的德国自然权利义务理论;探究其对民法体系构造的影响,借此揭示潘得克吞式民法体系的形成原因与内在机理。