Justice Takes a Recess examines why and under what circumstances presidents use the recess appointment power to appoint judges to the Federal courts. The authors show that the use of the recess power upsets the carefully calculated separation of powers envisioned by the Framers, shifting power away from one branch of government towards another.
This book provides a legal overview of the practice and responses to frequently asked questions.
In this Washington tale set in the near future, a president defies custom and nominates a non-lawyer, a retired journalist and old personal friend, as Chief Justice.
The 22-book American Milestone series is featured as "Retailers Recommended Fabulous Products" in the August 2012 edition of Educational Dealer magazine.
Activism,” New York Times, September 13, 1987; Stuart Taylor, Jr., “The Bork Hearings: Bork Backs Away From His Stances on Rights Issues,” New York Times, September 17, 1987; Stuart Taylor, Jr., “How Bork Recast Ideas in His Senate ...
About the Not This, But That Series No More Taking Away Recess and Other Problematic Discipline Practices is part of the Not This, But That series, edited by Nell K. Duke and Ellin Oliver Keene.
Additionally, over more than two centuries, a recurring theme in the Supreme Court appointment process has been the assumed need for professional excellence in a nominee.
Over more than two centuries, a recurring theme in the Supreme Court appointment process has been the assumed need for excellence in a nominee. However, politics also has played an important role in Supreme Court appointments.
Executive Overreach: The President's Unprecedented "recess" Appointments" : Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred...