This study returns to questions which have occupied critics of Hardy's novels since their first appearance: how should readers understand his rural world? Is he a reliable witness of contemporary conditions? What are his purposes as he describes the countryside of 'Wessex' and tells stories of its people? Critics typically recruit authors in support of their own world views, and over the last fifty years have cast Hardy as a social historian: a sympathetic and concerned portrayer of the rural poor, who positioned himself, so the novels persuade them, on the political left. This study challenges that view. Hardy's intense, even poetic, response to the familiar places of his native Dorset, combined with his powerful realist rhetoric, has encouraged the belief that his portrayal of rural society must be similarly accurate. But Hardy was not a disinterested observer, however much the authorial voice of the novels may persuade us that that is the case. Born and brought up in a village-tradesman family, he broke away, re-inventing himself first as a professional architect, and then as a successful man of letters. ignores, marginalizes, or treats dismissively the mass of rural poor, the agricultural labourers, whose condition was a running concern of the nineteenth century. His novels focus on the independent group to which his family belonged: 'an interesting and better-informed class, ranking distinctly above' the agricultural labourers, as he pointedly tells us. His fictions are coloured with a rich rural conservatism where social attitudes are concerned. Hardy's Wessex countryside is to be valued as metaphor, not reportage: for the latter we have to turn to that huge bulk of contemporary material highlighting the situation of the agricultural poor, nowhere more severely felt than in Dorset. It is no wonder that his early readers were puzzled. This study resolves the problem by reading Hardy's novels primarily as pastorals, and Wessex as a place of the mind. To introduce this argument, the first part of the study offers an edition of Hardy's article for Longman's Magazine, 'The Dorsetshire Labourer' (1883). important questions about Hardy's representation of the rural world in his novels, which becomes the focus of the second part of the study.
Volume 1 of the Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke presents Burke's early literary writings up to 1765, and before he became a key political figure.
The Works of Aphra Behn: The fair jilt and other short stories
The Ruined Cottage: The Brothers Michael
The greatest quotes from Dickens...an essential reference book providing every notable and quotable passage or short comment by Dickens on a subject which interested the great author...encompassing all his work.
This volume contains more than 350 letters, the great majority of them previously unpublished, which are supplemented, as before, by scrupulous annotation and extensive cross-referencing; by a chronology covering the whole of Hardy's career ...
Ed. J. M. Robson. Intro. Alexander Brady. Toronto and Buffalo: U of Toronto P; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1977. 213-310. . The Subjection of Women 1869. Essays on Equality, Law, and Education. Vol. 21 of Collected Works of John ...
Richard M. Dunn , Geoffrey Scott and the Berenson Circle : Literary and Aesthetic Life in the Early 20th Century 35. Gary Gautier , Landed Patriarchy in Fielding's Novels : Fictional Landscapes , Fictional Genders 36.
He was at one point tempted to join Rudolf Steiner's anthroposophical movement, as Biely had done. When he met Steiner in March 1911, he explained what in the school attracted him, asking Steiner whether one could be a writer and a ...
... Thomas 186 , 327 Davies , John 101 Davis , Lennard 315 De Quincey , Thomas 139 de Saussure , Cesar 312 de Muralt , Béat Loyis 308 Deal , gentlewoman of 288–9 , 332–3 death attitudes to 1-2 debtors suicides by 131 , 273-4 Deathy ...
that none of our students were black, few were women, or that the values we "disinterestedly" discovered in Jane Austen or E. M. Forster were at least partly determined by racial, social, and sexual presuppositions.