Manfred Fuhrmann, Joy Connolly, The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Though in Ancient Rome (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007), 1. Cicero and the Roman Republic, trans. W. E. Yuill (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992), 18. 3.
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Mooney, 126. Mooney, 8–9. Mooney, 127. Grassi, 7. Mooney, 135. Grassi, 8. Mooney, 29. Giambattista Vico, On the Study Methods of Our Time, trans.
In addition, discussions of Hermes' sophistry in the matter of oaths can be found in Callaway (1993), Gagarin (2007a), and Fletcher (2008). 13. Clay (1989) 106, 110–11. 14. In addition to the rhetorical techniques present in this speech ...
ence on Rhetoric in 1970 , which brought together scholars in speech , communications , philosophy , English , and ... and William Coleman , The Rhetoric of Western Thought ( Dubuque , Iowa : Kendall / Hunt Publishing Co. , 1976 ) .
This volume embodies the interdisciplinary character of rhetoric. The essays draw on wide-ranging conceptual resources, and combine historical, theoretical, and practical points of view.
William M. Sullivan, Reconstructing Public Philosophy, 156. Sullivan, Reconstructing Public Philosophy, 157. Thomas B. Farrell, Norms of Rhetorical Culture. Saggs comments that “the best archaeological evidence for the development of ...
Many writers attempted to provide manuals to help improve debating skills, but it was not until Aristotle produced The Art of Rhetoric in the 4th century bc that the subject had a true masterpiece.
The Prospect of Rhetoric: Report of the National Developmental Project, Sponsored by Speech Communication Association
The State of Speech presents a forceful challenge to this view. The first book to read Roman rhetorical writing as a mode of political thought, it focuses on Rome's greatest practitioner and theorist of public speech, Cicero.
This groundbreaking volume makes a case for historical rhetoric as disbursed, formal and informal lessons in persuasion that are codified as crafts that mediate between what is known and unknown in particular rhetorical situations.