"If peace breaks out, can arms control be far behind?" According to Colin S. Gray, this sardonic motto describes events of the 1990s just as well as it did those of the 1920s. Gray offers a provocative history of twentieth-century attempts at arms limitation, as he challenges the fundamental assumptions of arms control theory. Arms control has never worked, he concludes, because it never can. Existing approaches to arms control appeal to common sense, but they are logically unsound and inherently impractical, Gray argues, because they fail to take political realities into account. He outlines their inadequacies in what he calls the Arms Control Paradox: the more motivated nations are to fight one another, the less interested they will be in supporting significant arms limitations. Under these conditions, arms control agreements must be, to echo a phrase of George Will's, either impossible or unimportant. Documenting the naval treaties of the 1920s and 1930s and the initiatives to limit strategic nuclear arms from 1969 to the present, Gray seeks to demonstrate that the fortunes of negotiated arms limitation have merely reflected the temperature of international relations, rather than influencing those relations. National security analysts, students and scholars of international relations, and others interested in arms control issues will want to read House of Cards and debate its conclusions.
... 250 U.S. human rights policy as seen in , 42 U.S. immigration from , 209 USIS speakers requested in , 60 Mexico City , 287 Mexico Declaration , 250 Meyer , Cord , Jr. , 7 , 22 , 30 , 50 Meyer , Lawrence , 157 Mezvinsky , Edward ...
Arab-Israeli Dispute, 1969-1972
This study examines challenges presented by small arms and light weapons in the Pacific.
Timmerman details Iraq's purchases of strategic weapons--including chemical weapons--and lays the blame for their arms build-up in the laps of theWestern a llies who supplied them. This explosive report is...
Breaking the Cycle of North Korean Provocations: Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred Twelfth...
The Bush Administration conducted a review of US nuclear weapons force posture during its first year in office. Although the review sought to adjust US nuclear posture to address changes...
Responding to Iran's Nuclear Ambitions: Next Steps : Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, One Hundred...
Biological Weapons Convention protocols: status and implications : hearing before the Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations...
There is renewed and deep international concern about the catastrophic humanitarian consequences that would result from the detonation of nuclear weapons in populated areas. Yet 25 years after the end...
Reflecting the current debate about the value of traditional arms control in today¿s security environment, Arms Control and Cooperative Security thoroughly covers this complex topic. The authors critically review the...