The new model of policy design theory frames the discussion regarding the frequently analyzed Endangered Species Act (ESA) in this historical perspective. Since the 1970s, the Endangered Species Act (ESA), by virtue of its regulatory impact, has been a frequent subject of policy analysis. In this comprehensive history and critique of the ESA, Brian Czech and Paul R. Krausman incorporate the new model of policy design theory to frame a larger discussion about conservation biology and American democracy. Czech and Krausman provide a historical background of endangered species policy that integrates natural history, socioeconomic trends, political movements, and professional developments. Outlining the controversies surrounding the ESA, they find a connection between challenges to species conservation and challenges to democracy. After an assessment of ESA analyses that have been performed from traditional perspectives, they engage policy design theory to review the structural logic of the ESA, analyzing each clause of the legislation for its application of the fundamental elements of democracy. To address the technical legitimacy of ESA, they propose two new genetic considerations—functional genome size and molecular clock speed—to supplement phylogenetic distinctiveness as criteria with which to prioritize species for conservation. Next, they systematically describe the socioeconomic context of ESA by assessing and classifying the causes of species endangerment. A hybrid of policy analysis and ecological assessment, The Endangered Species Act: History, Conservation Biology, and Public Policy will appeal to scholars and students in the fields of natural resource policy and law, conservation biology, political science, wildlife ecology, and environmental history, and to professionals at agencies involved in wildlife conservation.
In this volume a distinguished committee focuses on the science underlying the ESA and offers recommendations for making the act more effective.
Cheryl Schultz & Leah R. Gerber, Are Recovery Plans Improving with Practice? 12 Ecological Applications 541, 646 (2002). 95. Joshua J. Lawler et al., The Scope and Treatment of Threats in Endangered Species Recovery Plans, 12 Ecological ...
The Endangered Species Act: A Guide to Its Protections and Implementation
60 Bennett v . Spear and Defenders of Wildlife provide two good examples of the Supreme Court's treatment of redressability in ESA cases . In Bennett , the plaintiff ranchers and irrigation districts challenged the validity of a ...
In this volume a distinguished committee focuses on the science underlying the ESA and offers recommendations for making the act more effective.
Mel Sembler Founder and Chairman The Sembler Company Wilson H. Taylor Chairman Emeritus CIGNA Corporation William H. Walton Managing Member Rockpoint Group, LLC William L. Walton Rappahannock Ventures LLC The Honorable Marilyn Ware ...
Main description: The first listed species to make headlines after the Endangered Species Act was passed in 1973 was the snail darter, a three-inch fish that stood in the way of a massive dam on the Little Tennessee River.
Endangered Species Act Amendments: Hearing Before the Committee on Resources, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on...
In 1978 the Supreme Court ruled that the Endangered Species Act barred the Tennessee Valley Authority from completing its almost-built, $120 million Tellico project because the project would destroy the...
When Congress passed the Endangered Species Act in 1973, it did so in the belief that threats to emblematic creatures like bison or commercial crops such as fish could be...