This book analyzes the relationship between the many and the few in the formation of a republican polity. It studies the case of Buenos Aires in the 1860s and 1870s, when the inauguration of a new national order in Argentina entailed a radical change in the ways of power. By exploring the different forms of participation of the people in the public life of the city, it illuminates a frequently neglected side of the process of construction and legitimization of political power in nineteenth-century Latin American societies. It also provides new historical evidence on the origins of democracy in Argentina, and proposes an interpretation of that process that challenges prevailing views. The book focuses on two major topics: the history of elections and electoral practices, and the creation and development of a public sphere. Its detailed, and often colorful, description of electoral procedures portrays a dynamic and competitive political life that contradicts traditional interpretations of the history of citizenship in Argentina. The author also argues that elections were not the only major element in the relationship between the many and the few, that these decades witnessed the formation of a public sphere: a space of mediation between civil society and the political realm, where different groups voiced their opinions and directly represented their claims. She studies three aspects of the life of the city that were symptoms of this process: the proliferation of associations, the expansion of the periodical press, and the development of a "culture of mobilization. The book concludes by assessing how its conclusions offer new clues to the study of the Argentine political system, the history of Latin American democracies, and, more generally, the relations between the many and the few in modern societies.
John G. Matsusaka's For the Many or the Few provides the first even-handed and historically based treatment of the subject.
Richard North's radical re-evaluation of the Battle of Britain dismantles this mythical retelling of events.
... and the very idea of scientific progress is superfluous as progress is unmeasurable. Kuhn actually asserts that there are no certain methods or methodological rules for evaluating scientific theories, although he does ...
... top 1 percent: See Anthony B. Atkinson, Thomas Piketty, and Emmanuel Saez, “Top Incomes in the Long Run of History,” Journal of Economic Literature 49, no. 1 (2011): 41–42. When railroad workers went on strike: See Robert E. Weir, ...
For a more thorough theoretical explanation of neoclassical economics, The Econocracy, a book written by members of the Rethinking Economics network, is quite helpful.” Neoclassical economics operates in a world of markets.
Only the four royal governors south of the Potomac, Virginia's Lord Dunmore, North Carolina's Josiah Martin, South Carolina's Lord William Campbell, and Georgia's James Wright, forcibly resisted the rebellion, but each was driven from ...
Cities are the focus of much of our national life. So it is right that cities are a focus of government policy, after many years of neglect. However, New Labour...
Oliver Toliver always thought of himself as a plain little boy who wouldn't even be noticed in a crowd of three.
In this fascinating book, New Yorker business columnist James Surowiecki explores a deceptively simple idea: Large groups of people are smarter than an elite few, no matter how brilliant—better at solving problems, fostering innovation, ...
It is a truism taught by the sages and prophets and proved repeatedly in the history of nations that wickedness and liberty cannot exist side by side.This book was recommended by Ezra Taft Benson in April 1972 LDS General Conference.