Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: Four Views

Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: Four Views
ISBN-10
0805447628
ISBN-13
9780805447620
Category
Bible
Pages
145
Language
English
Published
2008
Publisher
B&H Publishing Group
Authors
Daniel Wallace, Darrell L. Bock, Maurice Robinson

Description

The debate continues among today's leading Bible scholars about the conspicuous exclusion of twelve verses (16:9-20) in the gospel of Mark from some early Greek manuscripts.

Get the book

Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Search the book
eBay.com
eBay.com
Search the book

Other editions

Similar books

  • The Gospel According to Mark
    The Gospel According to Mark

    The earliest of the four Gospels, the book portrays Jesus as an enigmatic figure, struggling with enemies, his inner and external demons, and with his devoted but disconcerted disciples.

  • Gospel Women and the Long Ending of Mark
    Gospel Women and the Long Ending of Mark
    By Kara Lyons-Pardue

    183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 Juel insists: Mark's Gospel forbids precisely ... closure. There is no stone at the mouth of the tomb. Jesus is out, on the loose, on the same side of the door as the women and the readers.

  • The Original Ending of Mark: A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20
    The Original Ending of Mark: A New Case for the Authenticity of Mark 16:9-20
    By Nicholas P Lunn

    Souter's Greek NT also only cites the two uncials (Souter, Novum Testamentum Graece, footnote at Mark 16:9). 60. Metzger, Textual Commentary, 103; cf. idem., Canon of the New Testament, 269, “asterisks or obeli mark the verses as ...

  • Interpreting the Gospels and Acts: An Exegetical Handbook
    Interpreting the Gospels and Acts: An Exegetical Handbook
    By David L. Turner

    George E. Ladd, The Presence of the Future (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974). • George E. Ladd, A Theology of the New Testament, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans ... Matthew • David E. Aune, ed., The Gospel of Matthew selecTed resources [345]

  • The Dubious Disciples: Doubt and Disbelief in the Post-Resurrection Scenes of the Four Gospels
    The Dubious Disciples: Doubt and Disbelief in the Post-Resurrection Scenes of the Four Gospels
    By J. David Woodington

    5 6 Mark, SNTSMS 25 (London: Cambridge University Press, 1974). ... 20,” Filologia Neotestamentaria 17 (2004): 27 – 44; David Alan →Black, “Mark 16:9 – 20 as Markan Supplement,” in Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: 4 Views, ed.

  • A Dual Reception: Eusebius and the Gospel of Mark
    A Dual Reception: Eusebius and the Gospel of Mark
    By Clayton Coombs

    Table 1: Four Views on the Ending of Mark 16:8 the intended conclusion? yes no yes Mark wrote 16:9–20 at a later date than the rest of the Gospel.24 Mark 16:9–20 is Mark's intended conclusion.25 Markan authorshipof16:9-20? no Mark ...

  • The Doubt of the Apostles and the Resurrection Faith of the Early Church: The Post-Resurrection Appearance Stories of the Gospels...
    The Doubt of the Apostles and the Resurrection Faith of the Early Church: The Post-Resurrection Appearance Stories of the Gospels...
    By J. D. Atkins

    Graeme W. Clarke, The Octavius of Marcus Minucius Felix [ACW 39; New York: Newman, 2012], 69). Celsus's Jew and Caecilius both thought that the stories of Jesus's resurrection appearances were parallel to – even poor imitations of – the ...

  • Perspectives on Christian Worship: Five Views
    Perspectives on Christian Worship: Five Views
    By J. Matthew Pinson

    Chad Brand; contributors: Jack W. Cottrell, Clark Pinnock, Robert L. Reymond, Thomas B. Talbott, Bruce A. Ware Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: Four Views, ed. David Alan Black; contributors: Darrell Bock, Keith Elliott, ...

  • Mark
    Mark
    By Darrell Bock

    This reflects the apocalyptic perspective of Judaism. ... to the ending of Mark, see D. A. Black, ed., Perspectives on the Ending of Mark: Four Views (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Academic, 2008), esp. my essay, “The Ending of Mark: A ...

  • Does Mark 16: 9-20 Belong in the New Testament?
    Does Mark 16: 9-20 Belong in the New Testament?
    By David W. Hester

    style may show that he was a good storyteller.214 212. ibid. 213. ibid. 214. ibid. 215. J. Williams, “literary approaches.” 216. ibid., 22–24. 217. ibid., 38 Does Mark 16:9–20 Belong In The New Testament?