While most Americans count Abraham Lincoln among the most beloved and admired former presidents, a dedicated minority has long viewed him not only as the worst president in the country's history, but also as a criminal who defied the Constitution and advanced federal power and the idea of racial equality. In Loathing Lincoln, historian John McKee Barr surveys the broad array of criticisms about Abraham Lincoln that emerged when he stepped onto the national stage, expanded during the Civil War, and continued to evolve after his death and into the present. The first panoramic study of Lincoln's critics, Barr's work offers an analysis of Lincoln in historical memory and an examination of how his critics -- on both the right and left -- have frequently reflected the anxiety and discontent Americans felt about their lives. From northern abolitionists troubled by the slow pace of emancipation, to Confederates who condemned him as a "black Republican" and despot, to Americans who blamed him for the civil rights movement, to, more recently, libertarians who accuse him of trampling the Constitution and creating the modern welfare state, Lincoln's detractors have always been a vocal minority, but not one without influence. By meticulously exploring the most significant arguments against Lincoln, Barr traces the rise of the president's most strident critics and links most of them to a distinct right-wing or neo-Confederate political agenda. According to Barr, their hostility to a more egalitarian America and opposition to any use of federal power to bring about such goals led them to portray Lincoln as an imperialistic president who grossly overstepped the bounds of his office. In contrast, liberals criticized him for not doing enough to bring about emancipation or ensure lasting racial equality. Lincoln's conservative and libertarian foes, however, constituted the vast majority of his detractors. More recently, Lincoln's most vociferous critics have adamantly opposed Barack Obama and his policies, many of them referencing Lincoln in their attacks on the current president. In examining these individuals and groups, Barr's study provides a deeper understanding of American political life and the nation itself.
7 And the final language was taken almost word for word from the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, to which it had migrated from Thomas Jefferson's proposed Land Ordinance of 1784, which would have prohibited slavery in all the nation's ...
Johnathan O'Neill's Conservative Thought and American Constitutionalism since the New Deal examines how various types of conservative thinkers responded to this significant turning point in the second half of the twentieth century.
Public responses to the assassination have been well chronicled, but this book is the first to delve into the personal and intimate responses of everyday people—northerners and southerners, soldiers and civilians, black people and white, ...
... writers as Langston Hughes, Alice Dunbar Nelson, Jean Toomer, and Georgia Douglas Johnson made the capital their home. ... They called their organization the Tanner Art Students Society and in 1919 declared their desire to “promote ...
The Murder Trials of Abraham Lincoln George R. Dekle, Sr. ... Harold Holzer, “Reassessing Lincoln's Legal Career,” in Billings and Williams, Abraham Lincoln, Esq., 6, 10; Brian Dirck, “A. Lincoln, ... Barr, Loathing Lincoln, 10–11. 6.
Like most Southerners with any money, Booth checked into the St. Lawrence Hall, a hotel whose owner, Henry Hogan, described as the unofficial headquarters of Confederate agents and refugees.38 A picturesque coterie of twenty to thirty ...
Here again, theeffort to rewritehistory isshoddy: Lincoln actually ranfor office and won a presidential election, ... example of the UDC's pointed criticism of Lincoln is explainedby JohnBarrin his forthcoming book, “Loathing Lincoln.
"From leading Shakespeare scholar James Shapiro, [an] ... examination of what the world's greatest dramatist can teach us about life in an America riven by conflict"--
From award-winning Civil War historian George C. Rable, Damn Yankees! is the first comprehensive study of anti-Union speech and writing, the ways these words shaped perceptions of and events in the war, and the rhetoric’s enduring legacy ...
But if he was shaped by his times, he also managed at his life's fateful hour to shape them to an extent few could have foreseen. Ultimately, this is the great drama that astonishes us still, and that Abe brings to fresh and vivid life.