Throughout its history, the Supreme Court has had a contentious relationship with the press. Yet, as Joe Mathewson shows, the Court and the Press provide crucial services for each other as well: the press educates the public about the Court's actions, and the court is charged withe protecting the freedoms on which the press relies. In The Supreme Court and the press, Mathewson charts the history of this complex dynamic, from the court's early neglect of the First Amendment through the press's coverage of today's most controversial cases. With this history in mind, Mathewson brings his expertise as a Journalist and lawyer to bear in offering a diagnosis of the current situation, as well as offering solutions to the present shortcomings in the relationship between these two essential institutions.
With the financial crash of 1929, the bank's fortunes plummeted, and with it, the firm's. By the 1940s, the firm, then known as Mudge, Stern, Williams, and Tucker, had become a “legal backwater.”9 It had “good clients, good lawyers, ...
The Supreme Court and the News Media
After Fortas became a justice in 1965, Wolfson and Fortas agreed that the justice would receive twenty thousand dollars a year for life to serve as a consultant to Wolfson's foundation. However, Wolfson soon was facing criminal ...
When asked to explain how these activities amounted to impeachable offenses, Ford replied that “an impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be in a given moment of history.
Cohen v.
Analyzing every Supreme Court media case from 1931 to 1996, this book explores the changes in the United States Supreme Court's conception of the media's freedom and responsibility.
The legal roots of the current consensus are often traced to Chief Justice John Marshall. In his 1803 opinion in the case of William Marbury v. James Madison, Marshall, having characterized the Constitution as the "fundamental and ...
The book shows that the Court has consistently ruled in favor of the press's interpretation of the First Amendment on publishing issues such as prior restraints, libel, and privacy, but has not been persuaded that the First Amendment ...
This is a study of the evolution of constitutional doctrine -- particularly when transported from the rarefied air of the Supreme Court to lower court judges who may not share the values of the jurists above them in the judicial hierarchy.
A comprehensive history of the United States Supreme Court from its ill-esteemed beginning in 1790 to one of the most important and controversial branches of the Federal government.