Race and the Making of American Political Science shows that changing scientific ideas about racial difference were central to the academic study of politics as it emerged in the United States. From the late nineteenth century through the 1930s, scholars of politics defined and continually reoriented their field in response to the political imperatives of the racial order at home and abroad as well to as the vagaries of race science. The Gilded Age scholars who founded the first university departments and journals located sovereignty and legitimacy in a "Teutonic germ" of liberty planted in the new world by Anglo-Saxon settlers and almost extinguished in the conflict over slavery. Within a generation, "Teutonism" would come to seem like philosophical speculation, but well into the twentieth century, major political scientists understood racial difference to be a fundamental shaper of political life. They wove popular and scientific ideas about race into their accounts of political belonging, of progress and change, of proper hierarchy, and of democracy and its warrants. And they attended closely to new developments in race science, viewing them as central to their own core questions. In doing so, they constructed models of human difference and political life that still exert a powerful hold on our political imagination today, in and outside of the academy. By tracing this history, Jessica Blatt effects a bold reinterpretation of the origins of U.S. political science, one that embeds that history in larger processes of the coproduction of racial ideas, racial oppression, and political knowledge.
This volume explores how the study of race can transform our understandings of political development and how studying political development can inform our understandings of race and racialization.
U.S. Congress, House and Senate, 90th Cong., 1st sess., Congressional Record, vol. 113, pt. 23 (1967), 31812. 61. See, in general, Personal Papers of Ramsey Clark, LBJL. 62. Letter from Louis A. Chapin to Ramsey Clark, Apr. 21, 1968, ...
The difficult issues named above are not rooted in Black " pathology " —they are rooted in democratic inequality . ... and cultural service are the three goals identified by the national organization that guide the activities of the ...
TABLE 7.2 Support for Black Feminist Consciousness in 2004–2005 Black Women N=278 Black Men N=222 TOTAL N=500 67** 79** 72 The problems of racism, poverty, and sexual discrimination are all linked together. (Address All Discrimination) ...
This book extends what we know about the development of civil rights and the role of the NAACP in American politics.
Cedric Johnson is assistant professor of political science at Hobart and William Smith Colleges.
Race, more than class or any other factor, determines who wins and who loses in American democracy.
Race and the Making of American Liberalism traces the roots of the contemporary crisis of progressive liberalism deep into the nation's racial past.
Surveys American attitudes on affirmative action and racial issues
"In this book the author argues that we focus on the use of negative racial appeals by the Republican Party, while ignoring the incentives that exist for some Democratic candidates to use race as much as, if not more than Republican ...