In recent years, and in light of U.S. attempts to project power in the world, the presidency of Woodrow Wilson has been more commonly invoked than ever before. Yet "Wilsonianism" has often been distorted by a concentration on American involvement in the First World War. In Woodrow Wilson and the Great War: Reconsidering America's Neutrality, 1914-1917, prominent scholar Robert Tucker turns the focus to the years of neutrality. Arguing that our neglect of this prewar period has reduced the complexity of the historical Wilson to a caricature or stereotype, Tucker reveals the importance that the law of neutrality played in Wilson's foreign policy during the fateful years from 1914 to 1917, and in doing so he provides a more complete portrait of our nation's twenty-eighth president. By focusing on the years leading up to America's involvement in the Great War, Tucker reveals that Wilson's internationalism was always highly qualified, dependent from the start upon the advent of an international order that would forever remove the specter of another major war. World War I was the last conflict in which the law of neutrality played an important role in the calculations of belligerents and neutrals, and it is scarcely an exaggeration to say that this law--or rather Woodrow Wilson's version of it--constituted almost the whole of his foreign policy with regard to the war. Wilson's refusal to find any significance, moral or otherwise, in the conflict beyond the law and its violation led him to see the war as meaningless, save for the immense suffering and sense of utter futility it fostered. Treating issues of enduring interest, such as the advisability and effectiveness of U.S. interventions in, or initiation of, conflicts beyond its borders, Woodrow Wilson and the Great War will appeal to anyone interested in the president's power to determine foreign policy, and in constitutional history in general.
Hitler sent his co-conspirator Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter to Ludendorff's residence, informing the general that a coup had taken place and offering him command of the army. Hitler demanded that the captured officials ioin his new ...
Describes the role of Woodrow Wilson as a wartime President.
During the first 18 months of World War I, Woodrow Wilson sought to maintain American neutrality, but as this carefully argued study shows, it was ultimately an unsustainable stance.
Woodrow Wilson, Outline Sketch of a Note to Great Britain, March 19, 1915, and draft of Note, March 28, 1915, ibid., 399–401 and 443–49. See also Bryan to Wilson, March 22, 1915, and Wilson's replies to Bryan, March 24 and March 25, ...
... Saving the Reagan Presidency: Trust Is the Coin of the Realm, David M. Abshire Policy by Other Means: Alternative Adoption by Presidents, Steven A. Shull Institutionalizing Congress and the Presidency: The U.S. Bureau of Efficiency,
"Peace is on the floor waiting to be picked up!" pleaded the German ambassador to the United States. This book explains both the strategies and fumbles of people facing a great crossroads of history.
The Great War’s bitter outcome left the experience largely overlooked and forgotten in American history. This timely book is a reexamination of America’s first global experience as we commemorate WWI's centennial.
A Library of Congress Illustrated History Margaret E. Wagner. 1917, by Montana's senior senator, Henry L. Myers. Myers's Senate Bill 2789 remained in committee for months as the nation's war effort, and attendant patriotic fervor, ...
reoccupied by his love for Ellen, Woodrow was as restless and impatient at Johns Hopkins as he had been in Charlottesville and Atlanta. During his first month in Baltimore he wrote her long, pining love letters that omitted all mention ...
One of the major critiques of Woodrow Wilson came from the pen of one of the outstanding diplomatic historians, Thomas A. Bailey at Stanford University. Bailey argued that there were fourteen major steps that he characterized as Woodrow ...