Guns had an enormous impact on the social, economic, cultural, and political lives of civilian men, women, and children of all social strata in early modern England. In this study, Lois Schwoerer identifies and analyzes England’s domestic gun culture from 1500 to 1740, uncovering how guns became available, what effects they had on society, and how different sectors of the population contributed to gun culture. The rise of guns made for recreational use followed the development of a robust gun industry intended by King Henry VIII to produce artillery and handguns for war. Located first in London, the gun industry brought the city new sounds, smells, street names, shops, sights, and communities of gun workers, many of whom were immigrants. Elite men used guns for hunting, target shooting, and protection. They collected beautifully decorated guns, gave them as gifts, and included them in portraits and coats-of-arms, regarding firearms as a mark of status, power, and sophistication. With statutes and proclamations, the government legally denied firearms to subjects with an annual income under £100—about 98 percent of the population—whose reactions ranged from grudging acceptance to willful disobedience. Schwoerer shows how this domestic gun culture influenced England’s Bill of Rights in 1689, a document often cited to support the claim that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution conveys the right to have arms as an Anglo-American legacy. Schwoerer shows that the Bill of Rights did not grant a universal right to have arms, but rather a right restricted by religion, law, and economic standing, terms that reflected the nation's gun culture. Examining everything from gunmakers’ records to wills, and from period portraits to toy guns, Gun Culture in Early Modern England offers new data and fresh insights on the place of the gun in English society.
... Maryland , 1 : 343–344 ; 7 : 51–52 . 100. J. Thomas Scharf , History of Western Maryland : Being a History of Frederick , Montgomery , Carroll , Washington , Allegany , and Garrett Counties from the Earliest Period to the Present Day ...
... Margaret Cavendish, The Comical Hash, in Playes (London, 1662), at: http://text base.wwp.brown.edu.ezproxy.proxy.library.oregonstate.edu/WWO/search?keyword= beggar#!/view/cavendish.62l-hash.xml (accessed July 31, 2013). 39 Thomas Dekker ...
The Resources, Products, and Industrial History of Birmingham and the Midland Hardware District: A Series of ... The Case of the Company of Gun-Makers of the City of London. ... The Industrial Revolution: A Very Short Introduction.
On lyceums and their popularity, see [Holbrook], American Lyceum, 5. The story of Josiah Holbrook's lyceum is usually told in triumphal terms and framed as something new. “Ordinary citizens,” one historian wrote in the 1950s, ...
... No Standing Armies, 11 (quoting William Cecil, Lord Burghley, an adviser to Queen Elizabeth). 63. Schwoerer, No Standing Armies, 192. 64. In parliamentary debate, one member observed that being “a Soldier is a Trade, and must (as all ...
... Culture of Credit and Social Relations in Early Modern England. London: Palgrave, 1998. Neuhaus, Jessamyn. “Cooking ... Gun Culture in Early Modern England. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2016. Shiller, Robert J ...
... Gun Culture in Early Modern England ( Charlottesville , VA , 2016 ) . Sgard , Jérôme , ' Bankruptcy , Fresh Start and Debt Renegotiation in England and France ( 17th to 18th Century ) ' , in Thomas Max Safley , ed . , The History of ...
Religio Medici: Medicine and Religion in Seventeenth-Century England. Ed. Ole Peter Grell and Andrew ... The Material Letter in Early Modern England. Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512–1635.
Mark Netzloff is an Associate Professor of English at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. ... He is currently working on a book entitled Common: The Development of Literary Culture in Sixteenth-Century England.
In Armed Citizens, Noah Shusterman explains for a general reader what eighteenth-century militias were and why the authors of the Constitution believed them to be necessary to the security of a free state.