Asked if the country was governed by a republic or a monarchy, Benjamin Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.” Since its founding, Americans have worked hard to nurture and protect their hard-won democracy. And yet few consider the role of constitutional law in America’s survival. In Unfit for Democracy, Stephen Gottlieb argues that constitutional law without a focus on the future of democratic government is incoherent—illogical and contradictory. Approaching the decisions of the Roberts Court from political science, historical, comparative, and legal perspectives, Gottlieb highlights the dangers the court presents by neglecting to interpret the law with an eye towards preserving democracy. A senior scholar of constitutional law, Gottlieb brings a pioneering will to his theoretical and comparative criticism of the Roberts Court. The Roberts Court decisions are not examined in a vacuum but instead viewed in light of constitutional politics in India, South Africa, emerging Eastern European nations, and others. While constitutional decisions abroad have contributed to both the breakdown and strengthening of democratic politics, decisions in the Roberts Court have aggravated the potential destabilizing factors in democratic governments. Ultimately, Unfit for Democracy calls for an interpretation of the Constitution that takes the future of democracy seriously. Gottlieb warns that the Roberts Court’s decisions have hurt ordinary Americans economically, politically, and in the criminal process. They have damaged the historic American melting pot, increased the risk of anti-democratic paramilitaries, and clouded the democratic future.
A New York Times Book Review Editors’ Choice “Everyone worried about the state of contemporary politics should read this book.” —Anne-Marie Slaughter “A trenchant survey from 1989, with its democratic euphoria, to the current map ...
For versions of this argument, see Rousseau 1997; Gould 1988,45–85. Carol Gould argues that democracy is necessary for the good of autonomous self-government and goes on to assert that citizens are entitled to democracy. 18.
Why our belief in government by the people is unrealistic—and what we can do about it Democracy for Realists assails the romantic folk-theory at the heart of contemporary thinking about democratic politics and government, and offers a ...
If you want to clarify why that is so along with where hope lies in the future, then read this book.
Here I follow Arthur Ripstein's Kantian account in “Authority and Coercion,” Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (2004), pp. 2–35, “Beyond the Harm Principle,” and Arthur Ripstein, Force and Freedom (Cambridge, Mass.
In Democracy under Fire, Lawrence Jacobs provides a highly engaging, if disturbing, history of political reforms since the late-eighteenth century that over time dangerously weakened democracy, widened political inequality as well as racial ...
Urbinati, “Competing for Liberty: The Republican Critique of Democracy,” American Political Science Review 106 (August ... In Harold W. Stanley and Richard G. Niemi, eds., Vital Statistics on American Politics, 2013–2014 (Washington, ...
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1899 edition.
Within this important book, Frank Vibert sets out the key challenges to reform, the ways in which constitutions should be revitalised and provides the standards against which reform should be measured.
Unfit for the Future argues that the future of our species depends on radical enhancement of the moral aspects of our nature.