A War of Words analyzes Jefferson Davis’s public discourse, arguing that throughout his time as president of the Confederacy, Davis settled for short-term rhetorical successes at the expense of creating more substantive and meaningful messages for himself and his constituents. Numerous biographies of Jefferson Davis have been penned; however, until now, there had been no substantive analysis of his public discourse as president of the Confederacy. R. Jarrod Atchison’s A War of Words uses concepts from rhetorical theory and public address to help answer a question that has intrigued scholars from a variety of disciplines since the collapse of the Confederacy: what role, if any, did Davis play in the collapse of Confederate nationalism? Most discussions of Davis and nationalism focus on the military outcomes of his controversial wartime decisions. A War of Words focuses less on military outcomes and argues instead that, in the context of the Confederacy, Jefferson Davis’s rhetorical leadership should have been responsible for articulating a vision for the nation—including the core tenets of its identity, the values the nation should hold dear, the principles it should never compromise, and the goals it should set for its future. Undoubtedly, Davis possessed the skills necessary to make a persuasive public argument. It is precisely because Davis’s oratory skills were so powerful that there is room to judge how he used them. In short, being a great orator is not synonymous with successful rhetorical leadership. Atchison posits that Davis’s initial successes constrained his rhetorical options later in the war. A War of Words concludes that, in the end, Davis’s rhetorical leadership was a failure because he was unable to articulate a coherent Confederate identity in light of the sacrifices endured by the populace in order to sustain the war effort.
Paul Tripp identifies the attitudes and assumptions behind our words and shows how to develop God-honoring communication.
William Paterson, A Brief Account of the Intended Bank of England (London: Randal Taylor, 1694), p. ... Patricia Nilsson and Emiko Terazano, “Can Fast Fashion's $2.5tn Supply Chain Be Stitched Back Together?,” Financial Times, May 16, ...
This authoritative edition includes an introduction from the editors explaining the compositional history and cultural contexts of both The War of Words and A Rhetoric of Motives.
Brown , Malcolm , The Imperial War Museum Book of the First World War : A Great Conflict Recalled in Previously Unpublished Letters , Diaries , Documents , and Memoirs ( London : Sidgwick and Jackson , 1991 ) .
A shrewd politician, Abraham Lincoln recognized the power of the press.
Incorporating contexts from around the world, this collection's topics range from a radio talk show hosts' inflammatory rhetoric to the semantic poverty of the lexicon of mass destruction. The first eight chapters discuss war texts.
The War of Words
War of Words is an incisive report from the linguistic battlefields, probing the tales told about September 11th to show how Americans created consensus in the face of terror.
Quoted in Michael Anesko, “Friction with the Market”: Henry James and the Profession of Authorship (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 87. 5. The Bostonians: A Novel (New York: Modern Library, 1965); page numbers given in the ...
Selling the War on Terror from Afghanistan to Iraq Wojtek Mackiewicz Wolfe. build new partnerships to better preserve the peace. It will reduce the stress on our troops and on our military families. It was save the taxpayers money, ...