This book examines, from a behavioral perspective, the U.S. Supreme Court's exercise of the power of judicial review over Congress across two hundred years of the Court's history, testing the major competing theories in political science - the attitudinal model and the strategic approach - through systematic empirical analysis. Exploring the major trends in the Court's use of this power over time, the book examines a broad range of questions concerning the countermajoritarian nature of this power, and provides an analysis of each of the individual justices' behavior along several dimensions of the power, such as the use of judicial review to protect minority rights against majority intrusion. The book concludes that the Court has shown a high level of deference to Congress, with notable historic highs and lows, and generally that the exercise of the power has been less countermajoritarian than is usually assumed. Its analyses find the strongest level of support for the attitudinal approach to judicial decision making, but also concludes that strategic concerns cannot be dismissed, especially for the more recent Courts.
Annotated text examines the legitimacy of judicial review.
L. Lomax, The Negro Revolt 73-74 (1962). 160. E. Cleaver, Soul on Ice 3 (1968). 161. Carter, The Warren Court and Desegregation, 67 Mich. L. Rev. 237, 247 (1968). 162. Id. 246. 163. 388 U.S. 1 (1967). 164. See Applebaum, Miscegenation ...
A thorough analysis of the early history and development of judicial review, this book by a preeminent scholar ranks among the most cited and highly regarded texts on law and government.
This book, first published in 1914, contains five historical essays.
Available as a single volume or as part of the 10 volume set Supreme Court in American Society
At the same time, Congress is cast as a singularly political enterprise with little regard for nuanced lawmaking. This volume of original essays by leading scholars shows both branches in a new light.
The People and the Court: Judicial Review in a Democracy
99-100 Frontiero v. Richardson, 136-37. 139. 140. 141. 143 Fullilove v. Klutznick. 108-109 Gem v. Welch. 167. 171-74. 176 Goesaert v. Cleary. 135-36. 137. 138. 139. 147 Goldberg. Rostker v.. 140 Grand Rapids [Michigan] School Dist. v.
The USA may want to believe that the Supreme Court is above politics; in fact the Court is a political institution and operates in a political environment to advance controversial principles, often with the aid of political leaders who ...
"This book provides a thorough overview of the law of judicial and political control of federal agencies.