Despite its importance to the life of the nation and all its citizens, the Supreme Court remains a mystery to most Americans, its workings widely felt but rarely seen firsthand. In this book, journalists who cover the Court—acting as the eyes and ears of not just the American people, but the Constitution itself—give us a rare close look into its proceedings, the people behind them, and the complex, often fascinating ways in which justice is ultimately served. Their narratives form an intimate account of a year in the life of the Supreme Court. The cases heard by the Surpreme Court are, first and foremost, disputes involving real people with actual stories. The accidents and twists of circumstance that have brought these people to the last resort of litigation can make for compelling drama. The contributors to this volume bring these dramatic stories to life, using them as a backdrop for the larger issues of law and social policy that constitute the Court’s business: abortion, separation of church and state, freedom of speech, the right of privacy, crime, violence, discrimination, and the death penalty. In the course of these narratives, the authors describe the personalities and jurisprudential leanings of the various Justices, explaining how the interplay of these characters and theories about the Constitution interact to influence the Court’s decisions. Highly readable and richly informative, this book offers an unusually clear and comprehensive portrait of one of the most influential institutions in modern American life.
With essays focused on individual Justices, Court practices, and some of last year’s most important rulings, this volume explores the meaning and significance of the Court’s 2002–03 term.
This book -- the first of its kind -- is the personal memoir of the overzealous young Knox, an unprecedented insider's view of the showdown between Roosevelt and the Court.
... Sanborn of the Ramsey County Court, Blackmun claimed the citywide award with a speech titled, “May our great 'Ship of State' sail on, manned by those who dare to live and die for freedom's cause!”25 Interestingly, Blackmun was to ...
The original lead plaintiff was Shelly Parker, which is why the case was known in early phases as Parker v. District of Columbia. 9. Transcript of MacNeil-Lehrer NewsHour, December 16, 1991. 10. 11. Parker v.
The Court and the cult of secrecy. In R. A. Smolla (Ed.), A year in the life of the Supreme Court (pp. 263–279). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Mauro, T. (2003a, May 19). Lessons from a lifetime at the lectern. Legal Times, p. 8.
Stephen Bindman, a former reporter who now works for the Department of Justice, also believes that more reporting on the justices and their backgrounds would be beneficial. But he believes care must be taken. According to Bindman (2001) ...
Kluger, Richard. Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and the History of Black America's Struggle for Equality. New York: Vintage, 2004. Knowles, Helen J. The Tie Goes to Freedom: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on ...
Christian Smith, a sociologist at Notre Dame, describes the Millennials as supporters of “Generation Me” in contrast to “Generation We.”68 Seen this way, Millennial tinkering presents religious leaders with a challenge.
The second edition provides a very strong introduction to political institutions and includes a new chapter on public opinion.
A comprehensive history of the people and cases that have changed history, this is the definitive account of the nation's highest court featuring a forward by Howard Zinn Recent changes in the Supreme Court have placed the venerable ...