This book tests the proposition that the humanities can, and at their best do, represent a commitment to ethical reading. And that this commitment, and the training and discipline of close reading that underlie it, represent something that the humanities need to bring to other fields: to professional training and to public life. What leverage does reading, of the attentive sort practiced in the interpretive humanities, give you on life? Does such reading represent or produce an ethics? The question was posed for many in the humanities by the “Torture Memos” released by the Justice Department a few years ago, presenting arguments that justified the use of torture by the U.S. government with the most twisted, ingenious, perverse, and unethical interpretation of legal texts. No one trained in the rigorous analysis of poetry could possibly engage in such bad-faith interpretation without professional conscience intervening to say: This is not possible. Teaching the humanities appears to many to be an increasingly disempowered profession—and status—within American culture. Yet training in the ability to read critically the messages with which society, politics, and culture bombard us may be more necessary than ever in a world in which the manipulation of minds and hearts is more and more what running the world is all about. This volume brings together a group of distinguished scholars and intellectuals to debate the public role and importance of the humanities. Their exchange suggests that Shelley was not wrong to insist that poets are the unacknowledged legislators of mankind: Cultural change carries everything in its wake. The attentive interpretive reading practiced in the humanities ought to be an export commodity to other fields and to take its place in the public sphere.
Is there an ethics of reading, and is this something that the interpretive humanities can and should to contribute to other professional fields, including law, and to public life?
Is there an ethics of reading, and is this something that the interpretive humanities can and should to contribute to other professional fields, including law, and to public life?
... 2017, http://thevillager.com/2017/10/26/38853les -chinatown-rezoning/. Altman, Irwin, and Setha M. Low, ... Austensen, Maxwell, Vicki Been, Luis Inaraja, et al. “State of New York City's Housing and Neighborhoods: 2016 Report.
Combining a practitioner’s focus on case studies with the scholar’s more abstract and theoretical approach, this collection of essays is useful for both teaching and appreciating public humanities.
Boas, Taylor C., and Jordan Gans-Morse. 2009. Neoliberalism: From New Liberal Philosophy to Anti-Liberal Slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development 44 (2): 137–161. Bod, Rens. 2013. A New History of the Humanities: The ...
Witness James Wideman declared in a sworn statement that the boy “did break and enter into the dwelling house. . . . And then did steal and carry away therefrom 1 overcoat, 1 hat, 1 undershirt, 1 Top Shirt, 1 shot gun, 1 Pr Pants, ...
Penelope Project Timeline -- Appendix 2. Penelope Project Team -- Appendix 3. Partnership Agreement -- Appendix 4. Prompts for Penelope Activities and Challenges -- Appendix 5. Storytelling and Playwriting Syllabus -- Appendix 6.
... Pat Enos, Rachelle Woodbury, Jessica Rivait, Jan Hartough, Wynne Wright, Elaine Brown, Kenneth Fields, Marjorie Ford, Ann Watters, James Karagon, Nicholas Holton, Marylee Davis, Bill HartDavidson, Laura Julier,and Ralph Menendez, ...
A more conventional approach is to do as Trilling suggested and recall the phrase's origin in Swift:'Aesop, in Swift's Battle of the Books, moralizes thus on the bee's quarrel with the spider: “Instead of dirt and poison, ...
"A finely wrought picture of academic life before disciplinary professionalization." -- History of Education Quarterly