Addressing the controversy surrounding political bias on American college campuses, the former President of Hampshire College presents a compelling argument against neutrality in higher education.
From the Author's Introduction:
Many conservatives argue the liberal bias of faculty in the United States is compromising the ability of universities to teach the art of critical thinking, which is so essential to challenging conventional wisdom and even challenging authority. They argue that the proper role of the liberal arts faculty and university is to maintain an institutional posture of neutrality in the face of major intellectual and social issues and, having laid out the main arguments about an issue, leave it up to the students to make up their own minds. If these advocates of "neutralism"-in and of itself a non-neutral position-succeed in transforming universities into neutral institutions, they will undermine the critical thinking they seek to support. They will damage the very character of US education that the rest of the world so admires and increasingly attempts to emulate-its capacity to encourage creativity and risk taking and to produce students who have the courage to challenge authority and convention in appropriate and constructive ways... To silence the university is to silence the citizenry. Our country and the world require from educational institutions commitment, engagement, and action, not neutrality.
Teach Them to Challenge Authority gets to the heart of what education should really be about. Drawing on decades of experience, Gregory S. Prince Jr. moves seamlessly between his experience as President of Hampshire college and the broader, bigger picture made up of national and international issues. He demonstrates that the debate between those who favor "neutral" universities and those who favor "engaged" ones could have radical consequences-not just for the world of education, but for society as a whole.
Addressing the controversy surrounding political bias on American college campuses, the former President of Hampshire College presents a compelling argument against neutrality in higher education.
From the Author's Introduction:
Many conservatives argue the liberal bias of faculty in the United States is compromising the ability of universities to teach the art of critical thinking, which is so essential to challenging conventional wisdom and even challenging authority. They argue that the proper role of the liberal arts faculty and university is to maintain an institutional posture of neutrality in the face of major intellectual and social issues and, having laid out the main arguments about an issue, leave it up to the students to make up their own minds. If these advocates of "neutralism"-in and of itself a non-neutral position-succeed in transforming universities into neutral institutions, they will undermine the critical thinking they seek to support. They will damage the very character of US education that the rest of the world so admires and increasingly attempts to emulate-its capacity to encourage creativity and risk taking and to produce students who have the courage to challenge authority and convention in appropriate and constructive ways... To silence the university is to silence the citizenry. Our country and the world require from educational institutions commitment, engagement, and action, not neutrality.
Teach Them to Challenge Authority gets to the heart of what education should really be about. Drawing on decades of experience, Gregory S. Prince Jr. moves seamlessly between his experience as President of Hampshire college and the broader, bigger picture made up of national and international issues. He demonstrates that the debate between those who favor "neutral" universities and those who favor "engaged" ones could have radical consequences-not just for the world of education, but for society as a whole.
Ben shu ju jiao yu zhi jiao shi zi de su zhi pei yang,Cong biao zhun ru shou,Chuang zao xing di kai fa le zhi jiao shi zi su yang biao zhun,Bing yi ci wei ji chu xi tong kai fa le yong yu zhi jiao shi zi su yang ti sheng de pei yang fang an ...
Korn and Bursztyn and their contributors examine the cultural transitions that children make as they move between home and school. Case studies present instances of how diversity engages us in renegotiating the personal and social.
Shade part of each of the following regions as suggested by the given fraction . VM 11.4 QQQQQ 3 4 8 3 8 4. ... Write each of the following as a fraction in simplest form . a ) b ) to c ) d ) e ) A f ) g ) h ) 34 8.
Drawing on the original essays of four distinguished historians—Hugh Hawkins, James Axtell, David All- mendinger, and David Potts—the cumulative impact of this volume was to upset the conventional notion that somehow liberal arts ...
So we said , no guarantee , no deal . And everything were fine . Till two year ago . We're renegotiating . What they do ? Promote a darky , don't they . OK , on the nightshift , and that's as black as ink . But once they set a precedent ...
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2004). Primal leadership: Learning to lead with emotional intelligence. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2002). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.).
Pearson Prentice Hall® is a trademark of Pearson Education , Inc. Hannuloks 42581708 mech 1-12-4 CONTENTS Preface 29.5 ... Printed in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 ISBN 0-13-143775-5 Pearson Education Ltd. , London ...
THE NORTH CAROLINA STUDY Corbett , Gentry , and Pearson ( 1993 ) surveyed 185 high school students in North Carolina on the frequency and seriousness of sexual harassment in their schools . Most students did not feel that sexual ...
New York : Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing , 1988/1996 . Delgago , R. , and Stefancic , J. ( eds . ) . Critical White Studies : Looking Behind the Mirror . Philadelphia : Temple University Press , 1997 .
Savage Inequalities : Children in America's Schools . New York : Crown . Leonard , H. B. 1992. By Choice or By Chance ? Tracking the Values in Massachusetts Public Spending . Boston : Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research .