This paper examines several aspects of the private prison debate: (1) How much scope is there for improving the technical and economic efficiency of incarceration through contracting-out to private prison entrepreneurs? (2) Will a fully developed corrections industry be sufficiently competitive to ensure that any efficiency gains are passed on to the taxpayers? and (3) Would contracting-out for prison management create the opportunity for private firms to exercise influence, illegitimately and inefficiently, over public decisions about corrections? This assessment yields the following major conclusions: (1) neither theory nor the limited data that exist suggest that the task of incarceration is very well suited to the advantages offered by profit-seeking organizations--chiefly, cost consciousness and an aptitude for innovation; (2) there are serious structural barriers to genuine competition for prison management contracts; (3) in general, the enterprise of incarcerating people has relatively little scope for technical progress in trimming costs; (4) even if private-prison corporations succeed in cutting costs, there is unlikely to be sufficient competition in any given community to ensure that the savings result in diminished government budgets for corrections; (5) there is a substantial likelihood that government contracts with prison corporations will fully protect neither the interests of the public nor the prison inmates; (6) although private prisons might not be as unaccountable or inhumane as some critics have predicted, neither do they offer anywhere near the advantages promoted by their advocates and agents; (7) incarceration today remains a symbolically potent public function; and (8) dismissing widespread uneasiness among policymakers about introducing profits into punishment and corrections requires far more compelling practical advantages than private prisons are likely to deliver. Six pages of notes are included at the end of the paper. (NLL)
This reader introduces the student to prison management.
... a role in allowing Governor Jerry Brown's administration to reach court-ordered prison population levels in early 2015. ... signed by Brown in 2011 and commonly called “Realignment,” dramatically shifted the state of California's ...
In Colson's first novel, Gideon's Torch, the National Institutes of Health plans to harvest brain tissue from partial-birth abortions to treat AIDS patients, a scheme funded by Hollywood galas. Colson even has his anti-abortionist ...
For-Profit Prisons takes a close look at the side of the US prison system that relies on for-profit companies.
Private prison .A private prison or for-profit prison, jail, or detention center is a place in which individuals are physically confined or interned by a third party that is contracted by a government agency.
A bold solution is required; increasingly it is being seen to reside in the private sector. This timely volume explores the issues of private versus public financing, construction, and management of medium-and high-security prisons.
This book examines the current state of both the theory and practice of prison privatization in the United States in the 21st century, providing a balanced compendium of research that allows readers to draw their own conclusions about this ...
This book introduces the issues presented by the operation of prisons, or prison programs, by private-sector organizations. Private involvement with adult correctional institutions takes three major forms: (1) private financing...
John D. Donahue, Prisons for Profit; Public Justice, Private Interests (Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute, 1988), p. 14. 3. Quoted in Philadelphia Inquirer, February 1, 1986. 4. Dave Kelly, President, Council of Prison Locals, ...
97 Union General Benjamin Butler: Benjamin F. Butler and Jessie Ames Marshall, Private and Official Correspondence of Gen. Benjamin F. Butler during the Period of the Civil War, Vol. II (Norwood, MA: Plimpton Press, 1917), 209.