Europe has everything to lose from nuclear war, and nothing to gain from it. Yet it is nuclear deterrence that we are relying on to shield us from war. More and more people are coming to believe that security under a nuclear shield is an illusion, and that nuclear deterrence embodies a dangerous paradox. It is too close to provocation, it cannot prevent nuclear blackmail, and its short-term success can only lead to proliferation and ultimate instability. In this book, originally published in 1983, philosophers go behind the rhetoric of the nuclear debate and analyse the dangers of deterrence. The contributors all share a concern about the radical confusions that have arisen concerning nuclear deterrence. Showing how unilateral arguments can be developed from hard-headed political and military considerations, they stress their belief that carefully managed unilateralism is the best method for securing the political independence of Western Europe. The doctrine is not founded on sheer moral idealism. This book will be essential reading for anyone engaged in the public discussion of defence policy.
Originally published in 1985, Deterrence in the 1980s offers analyses by leading American and Canadian scholars and decision-makers in the field of strategic studies of the current problems and dilemmas of contemporary international ...
... John F. , I Khan , A. Q. , 137 , 218n80 , 2401104 Khan , Feroz Hasan , 35 , 36 Khan , Ghulam Ishaq , 109 Khan , Kamran , 199n55 Khan , Nur , 148 Khan , Sahibzada Yaqub , 104 , 224-22512 Khan , Yahya , 66 Khan , Zulfikar Ali , 229n46 ...
Amerikanske synspunkter, som de har udviklet sig, vedrørende anvendelsen af atomvåben.
Våbenkontrol, våbenteknologi; Atomvinter, missilskjold; Afskrækkelse, sprænghoveder, nedrustning, spredning, antiballistiske missiler ABM, fleksibel gengældelse; Våbenkontrol og forsvarspolitik, strategisk forsvar, våbenreduktion, ikke-spredning; Global magtbalance, Vesteuropæisk politik, Kina's mening.
Finally, the book examines the utility of models, games, and simulations as decision aids in improving the naval forces' understanding of situations in which deterrence must be used and in improving the potential success of deterrence ...
Originally published in 1982, this book considers the ethical issues raised by nuclear policies and by the debate between proponents of the multilateralist/unilateralist approaches to disarmament and arms control at the time.
The author reviews the history of nuclear deterrence and calls for a renewed intellectual effort to address the relevance of concepts such as first strike, escalation, extended deterrence, and other Cold War-era strategies in today's ...
1989b , “ The Causes of War : A Review of Theories and Evidence , ” in Philip E. Tetlock et al . , eds . ... DC : United States Institute of Peace Press Lynn - Jones , Sean M. , 2001 , " Does Offense - Defense Theory Have a Future ?
The Logic of Deterrence
This book offers a succinct and detailed guide to understanding US policy from first use in Hiroshima/Nagasaki through the SALT I, SALT II, ABM and START efforts at arms control, to Star Wars, National Missile Defense and beyond.