Most people are too busy to keep up with all the good movies they’d like to see, so why should anyone spend their precious time watching the bad ones? In Why It’s OK to Love Bad Movies, philosopher and cinematic bottom feeder Matthew Strohl enthusiastically defends a fondness for disreputable films. Combining philosophy of art with film criticism, Strohl flips conventional notions of "good" and "bad" on their heads and makes the case that the ultimate value of a work of art lies in what it can add to our lives. By this measure, some of the worst movies ever made are also among the best. Through detailed discussions of films such as Troll 2, The Room, Batman & Robin, Twilight, Ninja III: The Domination, and a significant portion of Nicolas Cage’s filmography, Strohl argues that so-called "bad movies" are the ones that break the rules of the art form without the aura of artistic seriousness that surrounds the avant-garde. These movies may not win any awards, but they offer rich opportunities for creative engagement and enable the formation of lively fan communities, and they can be a key ingredient in a fulfilling aesthetic life. Key Features: Written in a humorous, approachable style, appealing to readers with no background in philosophy. Elaborates the rewards of loving bad movies, such as forming unlikely social bonds and developing refinement without narrowness. Discusses a wide range of beloved bad movies, including Plan 9 from Outer Space, The Core, Battlefield Earth, and Freddy Got Fingered. Contains the most extensive discussion of Nicolas Cage ever included in a philosophy book.
Acemoglu , Johnson , and Robinson 2005 instead show that the issue is more complicated . Some colonized countries are richer today than they otherwise would have been because the colonizing powers installed good institutions .
Mitchell, Maria. www.brainyquote.com/authors/maria_mitchell Moody-Adams, Michele M. “Theory, Practice, and the Contingency of Rorty's Irony.” Journal of Social Philosophy, ... Moran, Richard. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on ...
In Why It’s OK to Eat Meat, Dan C. Shahar argues the answer is no: it’s entirely possible to be an ethical person while continuing to eat meat—and not just the "fancy" offerings from the farmers' market but also the regular meat we ...
Why It's OK to Want to Be Rich Jason Brennan Why It's OK to Be Of Two Minds Jennifer Church Why It's OK to Ignore ... Titles: Why It's OK to Get Married Christie J. Hartley Why It's OK to Love Bad Movies Matthew Strohl Why It's OK to ...
Why It's OK to Ignore Politics Christopher Freiman Why It's OK to Make Bad Choices William Glod Why It's OK to Enjoy ... Titles: Why It's OK to Get Married Christie J. Hartley Why It's OK to Love Bad Movies Matthew Strohl Why It's OK to ...
Titles in Series: Why It's OK to Want to Be Rich Jason Brennan Why It's OK to Be of Two Minds Jennifer Church Why ... Titles: Why It's OK to Get Married Christie J. Hartley Why It's OK to Love Bad Movies Matthew Strohl Why It's OK to ...
Mary Beth Willard. Callcut, Daniel. n.d. “Living the Life Authentic: Bernard Williams on Paul Gauguin – Daniel Callcut | Aeon Essays. ... Ellis, Emma Grey. 2019. “Concerning Consent, Chappelle, and Canceling Cancel Culture.” Wired.
A hip, irreverent, witty tour of 203 of the worst movies of all time, describing absurd plotlines, the worst dialogue, most over-the-top performances, and memorably wacky scenes. Photos.
This book is essential reading for students of philosophy with an interest in film, aesthetics, and film theory. It will also be of interest to film enthusiasts intrigued by the philosophical implications of film.
In this little book, William Glod argues that it’s OK to allow people to make bad choices. It’s OK even if those choices risk causing a lot of harm.