This book offers a transnational perspective of evidentiary problems, drawing on insights from different systems and legal traditions. It avoids the isolated manner of analyzing evidence and proof within each Common Law and Civil Law tradition. Instead, it features contributions from leading authors in the evidentiary field from a variety of jurisdictions and offers an overview of essential topics that are of both theoretical and practical interest. The collection examines evidence not only as a transnational field, but in a cross-disciplinary context. Each chapter engages with the interdisciplinary themes cutting through the issues discussed, benefiting from the expertise and experience of their diverse authors.
Twining W (1982) The rationalist tradition of evidence scholarship. In: Campbell E, Waller L (eds) Well and truly tried. Law Book Company, Sydney, pp 211–249 (re-published in Twining W, Rethinking evidence. Exploratory essays.
... Plausible Argument in Everyday Conversation . Albany : State University of New York Press . 1995. A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy . Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press . 1996a . Argument Structure : A Pragmatic Theory . Toronto ...
Providing an accessible introduction to the application of multi-criteria analysis in law, this book illustrates how simple additive weighing, a well known method in decision theory, can be used in problem structuring, analysis and decision ...
In their Probabilistic Analysis of the Sacco and Vanzetti Case (Kadane and Schum, 1996), Kadane and Schum combine Modified Wigmorean Analysis with ideas on Bayesian probabilities and likelihood. They give a thorough analysis of the ...
Its clarity of explanation and argument make this classic legal text readily accessible to lawyers, philosophers, and any general reader interested in legal processes, human reasoning, or practical logic.
Suppose that E is the very first item of evidence we have considered in our inference about H. If this is so ... On one interpretation ( e.g. , Fisher 1959 , 11-12 ; Hacking 1965 , 199–200 ) Bayes supposedly advocated a flat or a ...
"This book is a practical guide to understanding selected federal rules of evidence and how they are applied. Knowing how to handle evidentiary issues will make or break your legal...
This book offers a general, yet substantive view of evidence law.
... Tom Heller, and Stewart Macauley; UCLA law professor Richard Abel; and Rutgers law professor Rand Rosenblatt. The conference brought together a number of scholars whom the organizers believed were engaged in similar kinds of work, ...
The book provides a survey of the leading problems, and outlines how future research using argumentation-based methods show great promise of leading to useful solutions.