This book challenges the notion of presidents being the sole steward of American interests through an examination of a range of policies.
In this book the authors look at the role of public opinion and the political costs that might follow unilateral action as constraints on presidents.
Drawing on data from original surveys, innovative experiments, historical polls, and contexts outside the U.S., the book highlights Americans' skepticism towards presidential power.
After the Rubicon challenges this conventional wisdom by illuminating the diverse ways in which legislators influence the conduct of military affairs.
In Going Local: Presidential Leadership in the Post-Broadcast Age, Jeffrey E. Cohen argues that presidents have adapted their going-public activities to reflect the current realities of polarized parties and fragmented media.
"Everything occurs within a context, and that context is essential for making sense of social phenomena.
But these investigations are far more than grandstanding. Investigating the President shows that congressional investigations are a powerful tool for members of Congress to counter presidential aggrandizement.
In this important and original book, R. Douglas Arnold offers a theory that explains not only why special interests frequently triumph but also why the general public sometimes wins.
1 David S. Broder, "When Doctors Disappear," Washington Post, June 26, 1983. 2 Patt Derian, "E1 Salvador: This is Progress?," Washington Post, February 6, 1983, p. B7. 3 Adam Hochschild, "Inside the Slaughterhouse," Mother Jones, ...
W. Lance Bennett at the University of Washington and John Zaller at UCLA have both written insightfully about the media's dependence on political elites. See, e.g., Bennett's “Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the U.S.” ...
Casey, “Church Plays Major Role,” n. pag. 7. Ibid. 8. The “world as it is” versus the “world as it should be" is an important concept stressed in Industrial Areas Foundation training programs. One of the major IAF critiques of most ...