Are nuclear weapons useful for coercive diplomacy? Since 1945, most strategic thinking about nuclear weapons has focused on deterrence - using nuclear threats to prevent attacks against the nation's territory and interests. But an often overlooked question is whether nuclear threats can also coerce adversaries to relinquish possessions or change their behavior. Can nuclear weapons be used to blackmail other countries? The prevailing wisdom is that nuclear weapons are useful for coercion, but this book shows that this view is badly misguided. Nuclear weapons are useful mainly for deterrence and self-defense, not for coercion. The authors evaluate the role of nuclear weapons in several foreign policy contexts and present a trove of new quantitative and historical evidence that nuclear weapons do not help countries achieve better results in coercive diplomacy. The evidence is clear: the benefits of possessing nuclear weapons are almost exclusively defensive, not offensive.
Clear and engaging, this book shows that military strategy is essential for understanding major events of the past and becomes even more critical today, in a world increasingly threatened by weapons of mass destruction, terrorist attacks, ...
"As Robert Art makes clear in a groundbreaking conclusion, those results have been mixed at best. Art dissects the uneven performance of coercive diplomacy and explains why it has sometimes worked and why it has more often failed.
Thomas C. Schelling. Union—showed unmistakable signs of response to the Western response, a feedback cycle. According to Thomas W. Wolfe, author of the introduction to one of the American translations of the volume, the Soviet authors ...
InRichard Bernstein's words, 'radical evil is making human beings superfluousas human beings' (Richard J. Bernstein, The Abuse of Evil: The Corruptionof Politics andReligion since 9/11 (London: Polity Press, 2005),p. 5).
This volume evaluates the impact of coercive arms control efforts to curb the spread of weapons of mass destruction in the twenty-first century.
This book examines the linkage between deviance and norm change in international politics.
In Atomic Assistance, Matthew Fuhrmann argues that governments use peaceful nuclear assistance as a tool of economic statecraft.
Few Americans know the full details behind this story or perhaps realize the devastating impact it could have had on the nation's post-Cold War foreign policy.
Sechser and Fuhrmann, “Crisis Bargaining and Nuclear Blackmail.” 2. Todd S. Sechser, “Militarized Compellent Threats, 1918–2001,” Conflict Management and 12. 13. 14. 15. Peace Science 28, no. 4 (2011): 377–401. 3.
“To resume economic assistance,” Hartman argued, “would suggest to the French we may not be as serious as we say about the ... 38 “Alfred L. Atherton and George S. Vest Thru: Mr. Christopher, Mr. Habib, Mrs. Benson to the Secretary, ...