What does it mean to have a constitutional right in an era in which most rights must yield to 'compelling governmental interests'? After recounting the little-known history of the invention of the compelling-interest formula during the 1960s, The Nature of Constitutional Rights examines what must be true about constitutional rights for them to be identified and enforced via 'strict scrutiny' and other, similar, judge-crafted tests. The book's answers not only enrich philosophical understanding of the concept of a 'right', but also produce important practical payoffs. Its insights should affect how courts decide cases and how citizens should think about the judicial role. Contributing to the conversation between originalists and legal realists, Richard H. Fallon, Jr explains what constitutional rights are, what courts must do to identify them, and why the protections that they afford are more limited than most people think.
The book advances the debate and makes a contribution to the theory and the practice of constitutional rights. This work explains the nature of constitutional rights.
A postscript written for the English edition considers critiques of the Theory since it first appeared in 1985, focusing in particular on the discretion left to legislatures and in an extended introduction the translator argues that the ...
This volume gathers leading figures from legal philosophy and constitutional theory to offer a critical examination of the work of Robert Alexy.
Centring around extensive case law analysis focusing predominantly on recent Supreme Court judgments, this book highlights and re-conceptualises the dynamics and mechanisms of constitutional law adjudication and provides the first ...
This book argues that there is now a global model for how such rights should function, and develops an original, philosophically grounded, account of their nature and scope.
In this book, the author presents a new interpretation of the origin of judicial review.
Hoover's next nominee, Owen Roberts, was not confirmed until May 20, 1930. Three weeks earlier, the short-handed Courtheard arguments inO'Gorman. When the Justices presumably divided four to four, the case was set for reargument in ...
Arkes re-examines legal cases and concepts long thought settled, finding that their meaning is far less clear than commonly accepted.
Citizen's Constitutional Rights and Duties: Nature and Scope
For rights to matter, rights violations need to be politically costly. But this is difficult to accomplish for unconnected groups of citizens.