This book provides a readable and comprehensive overview of the history, theory, law, and current debates over freedom of speech.
This book provides the background necessary to understanding the importance of free speech on campus and offers clear prescriptions for what colleges can and can’t do when dealing with free speech controversies.
In Free Speech, Jacob Mchangama traces the long, contested history of a powerful idea, beginning with its origins in the intellectual ferment of classical Athens, where it enabled the development of the world's first democracy.
In this book, a marvel of conciseness and eloquence, Fiss reframes the debate over free speech to reflect the First Amendment's role in ensuring public debate that is, in Justice William Brennan's words, truly uninhibited, robust, and wide ...
... see, for example, William Edward Nelson, The Legalist Reformation: Law, Politics, and Ideology in New York, 1920–1980 (Chapel Hill, NC, 2001); Richard Primus, The American Language of Rights (New York, 1999); Edward Purcell, ...
This book will resonate for anyone who has followed debates over #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, Critical Race Theory, and "cancel culture"; more specifically, it should have a major impact on many facets of academic life, from the classroom to ...
Drawing on a lifetime of writing about dictatorships and dissidents, Timothy Garton Ash argues that in this connected world that he calls cosmopolis, the way to combine freedom and diversity is to have more but also better free speech.
Rankin v. McPherson (1987) A few years later, the Supreme Court determined in Rankin v. McPherson that a clerical employee in a Texas constable's office spoke on a matter of public concern when she told her boyfriend in a private ...
... 1988; see also Daniel S. Levy, “Behind the Anti-War Protests That Swept America in 1968,” Time, January 19, 2018 (“While a March 1967 poll had shown that more than half of Americans supported the way Johnson was handling the war, ...
"Should we tolerate speech designed to spread intolerance? As we grope for a response, we find our constitutional and moral imperatives for tolerance and equality in conflict with the equally...
However, there has been little analysis of whether censorship effectively counters the feared injuries. Citing evidence from many countries, this book shows that "hate speech" are at best ineffective and at worst counterproductive.