Directed to scholars and senior-level graduate students, this book is an iconoclastic survey of the history of dualism and its impact on contemporary cognitive psychology. It argues that much of modern cognitive or mentalist psychology is built upon a cryptodualism--the idea that the mind and brain can be thought of as independent entities. This dualism pervades so much of society that it covertly influences many aspects of modern science, particularly psychology. To support the argument, the history of dualism is extended over 100,000 years--from the Paleolithic times until modern philosophical and psychological thinking. The questions regarding this topic that are answered in the book are: 1) Does dualism influence the scientific theories of psychology? 2) If so, should dualism be put aside in the search for a more objective analysis of human mentation?
C. Wade Savagem. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 108—118. 1992. “Skepticism and Reasoning to the Best Explanation,” Philosophical Issues 2 (ed. Enrique Villaneuva): 149—169. 1995. Metaepistemology and Skepticism.
In chapter 5 I discuss the relationship between Descartes's dualism and scholastic conceptions of the soul and its union with the body: this relationship is quite complex in interesting ways. Secondly, on various occasions Descartes ...
"The future is dualist" is the message of this book.
Mind, Brain and the Quantum. Oxford: Blackwell. Loosemore, R., and T. Harley. 2010. “Brains and Minds: On the Usefulness of Localization Data to Cognitive Psychology.” In Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping, edited by Stephen ...
This book provides a variety of defenses of mind-body dualism, and shows (explicitly or implicitly) that a thoroughgoing ontological materialism cannot be sustained.
But even in this case, necessarily coextensive concepts such as triangle and trilateral would be identical (Fodor 1995 ... He will not, as Fodor supposes, then be disposed to think of triangles as having three angles, and trilaterals as ...
How do we (basically) conceptualize a human being or, say, any 'person'? Is he just his 'body'? Or a 'mind' too besides his 'body'? What, then, is 'mind', or how...
In this controversial study, Gordon Baker and Katherine J. Morris argue that, despite the general consensus within philosophy, Descartes was neither a proponent of dualism nor guilty of the many crimes of which he has been accused by ...
This is a momentous book that no serious historian of philosophy will be able to ignore.
This monograph presents an interpretation of Descartes's dualism, which differs from the standard reading called 'classical separatist dualism' claiming that the mind can exist without the body.