When the United Nations Charter was adopted in 1945, states established a legal `paradigm' for regulating the recourse to armed force. In the years since then, however, significant developments have challenged the paradigm's validity, causing a `pardigmatic shift'. International Law and the Use of Force traces this shift and explores its implications for contemporary international law and practice.
This book explores the whole of the large and controversial subject of the use of force in international law; it examines not only the use of force by states but also the role of the UN in peacekeeping and enforcement action, and the ...
Looking through the prism of the contemporary challenges that this area of international law faces, including technology, sovereignty, actors, compliance and enforcement, this book addresses key aspects of international law in this area: ...
This is matched by a final section considering new security challenges and the emerging law in relation to them. Finally, the key arguments developed in the book are tied together in a substantive conclusion.
W. Michael Reisman, “Nuclear Weapons in International Law,” New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative ... FURTHER READING Boyle, Francis A. “The Relevance of International Law to the 'Paradox' of Nuclear Deterrence.
This volume invites a range of experts to examine over sixty conflicts, from military interventions to targeted killings and hostage rescue operations, and to ask how powerful precedent can be in determining hostile encounters in ...
1986] Rules on the Use of Force 123 doubts. He can argue that without international enforcement, censure has no impact on state actions: it remains merely rhetorical condemnation without sanctions. Law must be more than aspiration or ...
The author pursues, on historic lines, an estimation of the extent of legal prohibition of the use of force by states.
This book analyzes the legality of the use of force by the US, the UK and their NATO allies against Afghanistan in 2001.
This is the first book to analyze the lawfulness of the use of force against Iraq on the basis of formerly classified material made public by the official UK inquiry into the war.
whether the threat of force “was illegal in the circumstances prevailing in the lead-up to the signing of the Memorandum of Understanding”.51 Barker's starting point is to restate the ICJ's jurisprudence in the Nuclear Weapons Advisory ...