Merit-based tests and contests have become popular methods for allocating rewards – from trophies to contracts, jobs to grants, admissions to licenses. With origins in jurisprudence, methods of rewarding merit seem fairer than those rewarding political or social connections, bribery, aggression, status, or wealth. Because of this, merit-based competitions are well-suited to the societal belief that people should be rewarded for what they know or do, and not for who they know or are; however, judging merit is rarely an easy task – it is prone to a variety of biases and errors. Small biases and errors, especially in large competitions, can make large differences in who or what is rewarded. It is important, then, to learn how to spot flaws in procedures for judging merit and to correct them when possible. Based on over 20 years of theory and research in human judgment, decision making and social psychology, this unique book brings together for the first time what is known about the processes and problems of judging merit and their consequences. It also provides practical suggestions for increasing the fairness of merit-based competitions, and examines the future and limits of these competitions in society.
Judging Merit
Awarded the 2013 Birks Book Prize by the Society of Legal Scholars, Women, Judging and the Judiciary expertly examines debates about gender representation in the judiciary and the importance of judicial diversity.
The judging of merit in livestock is as fundamental to selection as selection is fundamental to improvement. The U.S. show ring has served to accelerate competitive progress among breeds, to...
Thecourts, asdescribed in Hamilton's argumentin The FederalistPapers, are the“least dangerous” branch (cited in Rossiter 1961). Courts interpretbut do not make the law. AsChief Justice John Marshall stated in Marburyv.
International judge Robert Cole's expert perspective on some of the important elements of judging the Whippet.
But in this book, J. Mark Ramseyer and Eric B. Rasmusen use the latest statistical techniques to examine whether that reputation always holds up to scrutiny—whether, and to what extent, the careers of lower court judges can be manipulated ...
89) values Branch Theorists Michael Scriven Elliot Eisner Robert Stake Ian Shaw Malcolm Parlett David Hamilton Egon Guba Yvonna Lincoln Values Branch theorists in the United Kingdom include Ian Shaw (1999) and Malcolm Parlett and David ...
... merit as the sole criterion for judicial appointment effects the appearance of opposition between merit and diversity which—though we might dismiss it as 'false'—has a significant impact on understandings of the judge, judging and the ...
58To this extent an alternative image is Weber's 'Kadi under the Palm Tree': see Kronman (1983), pp. 76–7. 59Boukema (1980), p. 76. reflects the demands and inherent limits of the judicial dispute-resolution.
State Judiciaries and Impartiality: Judging the Judges