What might be the outcome for philosophy if its texts were subjected to the powerful techniques of rhetorical close-reading developed by current deconstructionist literary critics? When first published in 1983, Christopher Norris’ book was the first to explore such questions in the context of modern analytic and linguistic philosophy, opening up a new and challenging dimension of inter-disciplinary study and creating a fresh and productive dialogue between philosophy and literary theory.
Norris brings out the marked shift of allegiance in de Man's thinking, from the thinly veiled conservative implications of the early essays to the engagement with Marx and Foucault on matters of language and politics in the late, posthumous ...
“This work is both enormously difficult to read and startlingly clear” (241). “The 'purpose' of the collection-as ... F672 Waller, Gary F. “Author, Text, Reading, Ideology: Towards a Revisionist Literary History of the Renaissance.
MICHAEL CRICHTON: . . . the limitations imposed by the idea of the objective observer. Einstein struck the first blow with his Special Theory of Relativity in 1905. . . ANN INTERPRETER: . . . and Cézanne died in 1906 .
Since the 1960s, the literary critic Harold Bloom has been producing some of the most powerful criticism in the United States.
This book is the first to explore such questions in the context of modern analytic and linguistic philosophy. In doing so it opens up a new and challenging dimension of inter-disciplinary study.
As a further example, take the character of “A Childe” in Earle's Micro-cosmographie, a child, he writes, Is a Man in a small Letter, yet the best Copie of Adam before hee tasted of Eve, or the Apple; and hee is happy whose small ...
But in this incisive new text, Brian Heaphy show exactly how the arguments of the great contemporary theorists play out against extended examples from real life.
Has psychoanalysis become postmodern? How are the various schools of psychoanalysis being altered by postmodernism? What role does psychoanalysis have to play in the cultural debate in postmodern times?
Thus Sollace Mitchell,in his closelyargued essay'PostStructuralism, Empiricism and Interpretation', remarksvery pertinently that'Derrida (and other poststructuralists) haveleft language hanging, unanchored to anything that would lend ...
Drawing on perspectives from anthropology, linguistics and education, and combining accessible readings with theoretical debate, Ian Reid makes a significant contribution to the debate about narrative theory.