The crux of the debate between proponents of behavioral psychology and cognitive psychology focuses on the issue of accessibility. Cognitivists believe that mental mechanisms and processes are accessible, and that their inner workings can be inferred from experimental observations of behavior. Behaviorists, on the contrary, believe that mental processes and mechanisms are inaccessible, and that nothing important about them can be inferred from even the most cleverly designed empirical studies. One argument that is repeatedly raised by cognitivists is that even though mental processes are not directly accessible, this should not be a barrier to unravelling the nature of the inner mental processes and mechanisms. Inference works for other sciences, such as physics, so why not psychology? If physics can work so successfully with their kind of inaccessibility to make enormous theoretical progress, then why not psychology? As with most previous psychological debates, there is no "killer argument" that can provide an unambiguous resolution. In its absence, author William Uttal explores the differing properties of physical and psychological time, space, and mathematics before coming to the conclusion that there are major discrepancies between the properties of the respective subject matters that make the analogy of comparable inaccessibilities a false one. This title was first published in 2008.
As with most previous psychological debates, there is no killer argument that can provide an unambiguous resolution.In its absence, author William Uttal explores the differing properties of physical and psychological time, space, and ...
INTRODUCTION There are three points about time and the way it usually is discussed today that have, in my opinion, an outstanding ... So if time really is just one more dimension and really has the same structure as a straight line, ...
This edited book presents the problems of time and direction from an interdisciplinary point of view, concentrating in particular on the following relations: • Time and physics • Time, philosophy and psychology • Time, mathematics and ...
The sand in the hourglass flows from top to bottom until the top is empty and the bottom is full . Now all of the pendulum's energy.is energy of motion , because the pendulum is at its lowest position and is moving its fastest .
social critic; Henri Poincaré (1854–1912), a French mathematician, theoretical physicist, and philosopher of science; Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947), a British mathematician, logician, and philosopher; Charlie Dunbar Broad ...
... physics, too, has progressed decisively by relegating the relevance of certain constituents of its observational and explanatory framework which up to now had held unlimited sway, such as time, space, and causality, to certain clearly ...
The book explores the variety of meanings of contextuality across different disciplines, with the emphasis on quantum physics and on psychology.
"The standard treatise on the general theory of relativity." — Nature "Whatever the future may bring, Professor Weyl's book will remain a classic of physics." — British Journal for Philosophy and Science Reflecting the revolution in ...
The present book is based on the select talks presented at the meeting, and aims to provide the interested layperson and specialist alike with a multidisciplinary sampling of the most up-to-date scholarly research on the nature of time.
This virtuosic work of popular science will lead you to a revelation as strange as it is true: your brain is, at its core, a time machine.