In a tough opening statement, M. Brewster Smith outlines his own life course and contrasts it with the agenda of social psychology in the present professional moment. "Today's journals, textbooks, and conferences represent a vigorous but narrow scientific specialty in psychology, the practitioners of which are more closely focused on agendas that are primarily and often only intelligible within the subdiscipline than was the case when I formed my identity as a psychologist." In contrast, Smith sees himself, and has long been seen by others, as a social psychologist in the tradition of Gordon Allport, Gardner and Lois Murphy, Kurt Lewin, and Muzafer Sherif. Smith's unique ability has been to contribute to the emergence of personality as a differentiated academic field and at the same time maintain strong interdisciplinary ties to a variety of fields ranging from sociology to philosophy. In recent years, such concerns have made the author a central figure in the development of Humanistic Psychology as a part of the American Psychological Association. Because of these wide ranging concerns, the major statements of Brewster Smith have appeared in diverse places. Here, brought into a unified and uniform frame of reference, one has his work on values and selfhood, humanistic psychology and the social sciences, and humanism and social issues brought together for the first time. The picture is of a major thinker who is at home in the details of psychology and in the broad areas of public interest and social policy. Brewster Smith discusses major issues in terms of the political processes involved in the public interest. These range from the issue of advocacy within social research to conceptualizing anew familiar issues within psychology. For the generalist interested in the broader meanings of social psychology to the specialist aiming to recapture the big issues with which the field was once identified, this is a must volume.
SCIENCE AND VALUE; SCIENCE OF VALUE The idea of science as a system of ethics might be clarified by considering it in relation to some other ideas. When I say science as value I am regarding the two as the same thing.
Marcus, George E., 1986, “Contemporary problems ofethnography inthe modern world system”, in James Clifford and George E.Marcus (eds),Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, Berkeley, California: University of ...
He adds , Thus the “ resolution " of the self - society tension in no way necessarily entails “ adjusting ” to the ... to post - conventional morality is not in keeping with the notion of a self - chosen , autonomous system of values ...
to other values and society at large . Self - discipline is the maintenance of orderliness and obedience with regard to the self and one's conscience . It takes into account various spheres of one's conduct and style of life ...
The Nietzschean Self argues that Nietzsche's account enjoys a number of advantages over the currently dominant models of moral psychology—especially those indebted to the work of Aristotle, Hume, and Kant—and considers the ways in which ...
Morality is not declining in the modern world.
This book is the fourth volume of selected papers from the Central European Pragmatist Forum (CEPF).
This is a popular way of making a self evaluation, which results in two kinds of self evaluation. ... Only from social life, from his contribution to society and the correspondent social position, could a person find his self value.
Understanding human values: Individual and societal. New York: Free Press. Rokeach, M., 81. Greenstein, T. (1976). Self-dissatisfaction as a determinant of change in authoritarianism. Unpublished manuscript, Washington State University, ...
Toward A New Agenda for Family Research Philip A. Cowan, Dorothy Field, Donald A. Hansen, Arlene Skolnick, Guy E. Swanson ... Social perspectives on the life course. ... Family history, social history, and social change.