The Social Meaning of Modern Biology analyzes the cultural significance of recurring attempts since the time of Darwin to extract social and moral guidance from the teachings of modern biology. Such efforts are often dismissed as ideological defenses of the social status quo, of the sort wrongly associated with nineteenth-century social Darwinism. Howard Kaye argues they are more properly viewed as culturally radical attempts to redefine who we are by nature and thus rethink how we should live. Despite the scientific and philosophical weaknesses of arguments that "biology is destiny," and their dehumanizing potential, in recent years they have proven to be powerfully attractive. They will continue to be so in an age enthralled by genetic explanations of human experience and excited by the prospect of its biological control.In the ten years since the original edition of The Social Meaning of Modern Biology was published, changes in both science and society have altered the terms of debate over the nature of man and human culture. Kaye's epilogue thoroughly examines these changes. He discusses the remarkable growth of ethology and sociobiology in their study of animal and human behavior and the stunning progress achieved in neuropsychology and behavioral genetics. These developments may appear to bring us closer to long-sought explanations of our physical, mental, and behavioral "machinery." Yet, as Kaye demonstrates, attempts to use such explanations to unify the natural and social sciences are mired in self-contradictory accounts of human freedom and moral choice. The Social Meaning of Modern Biology remains a significant study in the field of sociobiology and is essential reading for sociologists, biologists, behavioral geneticists, and psychologists.
Originally published in 1971.
This book offers a new account of Freud’s work by reading him as the social theorist and philosopher he always aspired to be, and not as the medical scientist he publicly claimed to be.
Ethical questions arising from developments in modern biology, such as "If we are genetically determined, where is free will?" "Is it right for humans to create new foods?" and "Should...
Taylor and Jones (1979), Cell 17: 771–779. 4. Jones (2011), Nature Cell Biology 13: 2. 5. Jones and Taylor (1980), Cell 20: 85–93. 6. Santi et al. (1983), Cell 33:9–10. 7. Ghoshal et al. (2005), Molecular and Cellular Biology 25: ...
Livingstone , R. W. ( 1935 ) Greek Ideals and Modern Life Oxford : Oxford University Press . Livingstone , R. W. ( 1944 ) Plato and Modern Education . The Bede Lecture . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
Jianhui, L. and Fan, H. (2003) “Science as Ideology: The Rejection and Reception of Sociobiology in China”, Journal of the History of Biology, 36: 567–578. Kaye, H. (1986) The Social Meaning of Modern Biology New Haven: Yale University ...
4:447–63. Jepperson, Ronald L. 1991. “Institutions, Institutional Effects, and Institutional- ism.” Pp. 143–63 in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Anal- ysis, edited by Walter W. Powell and Paul J. DiMaggio. Works Cited 289.
Some multivariate methods have been specifically designed to decompose the variability between codon usage within the differently abundantamino acids (Grantham et al., 1981; Perrière and Thioulouse, 2002), and this enables discovery of ...
Frederick L. Hoffman, Race Traits and Tendencies of the American Negro, American Economic Association, Publications, ... 393; John S. Williams, "The Negro and the South," Metropolitan Magazine, 27 (1907), 137-51; Benjamin R. Tillman, ...
The question of whether abortion should or should not be permitted, and under what circumstances, is among the most difficult and sometimes anguished decisions for contemporary men and women. How...