In a country built on the institution of private property, property-owner rights have been under attack. By arguing that private property is a fundamental liberty whose protection deserves the highest priority, Ellen Frankel Paul challenges one of the dominant trends of the past half century: the erosion of property rights via zoning and land use restrictions, carried on by government exercising its "police power" or promoting "the public interest." Paul begins by examining the arguments of environmentalists in support of land-use legislation, and explores a few particularly troubling examples of the exercise of eminent domain and police powers. She traces the philosophical arguments for the two powers as well as their tortuous judicial history, the meaning of property rights and investigates how previous thinkers have defended these rights is detailed, and Paul suggests a more adequate defense for them. In the concluding portion of the book, the very legitimacy of eminent domain is questioned and the author offers recommendations for its reform. This analysis is wide in scope and makes creative use of historical, legal, economic, and philosophic methodologies. It not only gives an account of the present power regulations on land, but also provides an exhaustive history of the development of the law in these two areas and of the philosophical ideas of the thinkers who helped shape this process. This book is distinctive because it places a theory of the just acquisition of property at the heart of the answer to the question of the extent to which governments can rightfully exercise the powers of eminent domain and police. "Amazingly, in a country built on the institution of private property, the right to property in land has been under increasing assault, and has seldom been defended. Paul's book--by arguing that private property is a fundamental liberty whose protection deserves the highest priority--is a major step toward filling the void."--Robert Hessen, Stanford University
Schultz shows that Kelo did not make new law but only broadened Supreme Court precedents, and he refutes claims that Kelo has opened the way to widespread eminent domain abuse.
In Batten v. United States,^ the question, as stated by the court, was "whether a taking of property, compensable under the Fifth Amendment, occurs when there is no physical invasion of the affected property but the operation and ...
This book is a comprehensive analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Kelo v. City of New London.
For instance, price controls seek to influence the nature of the prices that the market process would generate absent that intervention. Similarly, zoning laws, which are regulations that restrict the uses of land and buildings, ...
Examination of the concept of "takings" in the context of international law and international investment agreements. It is an analysis of the law relating to the takings of foreign property...
This book considers the interplay of law, ideology, politics and economic change in shaping constitutional thought, and provides a historical perspective on the contemporary debate about property rights.
This volume explores the legitimacy of government involvement in private economic actions by presenting a study of property takings.
Lambert, Bills and Acts, 133-34; Thompson, Making of the English Working Class, 237, and Customs in Common, 97-184; cf. Bentham, Theory of Legislation, 144. 40. Stoebuck, “General Theory,” 575-79; Treanor, “Origins,” 697 n. and Western ...
Never . . . since I've been on this Board.”88 Citizens who continued to express doubts were shushed, or ignored outright: [l]n the exchange between Mayor Briare and a Mrs. Clark . . . Mrs. Clark seeks to learn if ...
This edited collection is the first to use a common framework to analyze the law and economics of eminent domain around the world.