The Law of Public Communication
- ISBN-10
- 1351692348
- ISBN-13
- 9781351692342
- Series
- The Law of Public Communication
- Category
- Law
- Pages
- 632
- Language
- English
- Published
- 2017-07-06
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Authors
- William E. Lee, Daxton R. Stewart, Jonathan Peters
Description
Updated to reflect new developments through 2019, the tenth edition of The Law of Public Communication provides an overview of communication and media law that includes the most current legal developments. It explains the laws affecting the daily work of writers, broadcasters, PR practitioners, photographers, and other public communicators. By providing statutes and cases in an accessible manner, even to students studying law for the first time, the authors ensure that students will acquire a firm grasp of the legal issues affecting the media. This new edition features color photos, as well as breakout boxes that apply the book’s principles to daily life. The new case studies discussed often reflect new technologies and professional practices, including hot topics such as cyber bullying, drones, government surveillance, campaign financing, advertising, and digital libel. The Law of Public Communication is an ideal core textbook for undergraduate and graduate courses in communication law and mass media law. A downloadable test bank is available for instructors at www.routledge.com/9780367353094.
Get the book
Other editions
Similar books
-
The Law of Public Communication
By William E. Lee, Daxton R. Stewart, Jonathan PetersAmendment protection because the paraphernalia were marketed for illegal purposes.28 In Hoffman Estates, drug paraphernalia were displayed next to books and magazines entitled High Times, Marijuana Grower's Guide, A Child's Garden of ...
-
The Law of Public Communication, 11th Edition
By William E. Lee, Daxton Stewart, Jonathan PetersNichols, a case discussed earlier, the Tennessee Supreme Court said a jury could find the Memphis Press-Scimitar liable because it omitted critical facts from an article about a shooting.262 The Press-Scimitar truthfully reported that a ...
-
The Law of Journalism and Mass Communication
By Robert Trager, Susan Dente Ross, Amy ReynoldsWhen Justin Timberlake distributed a picture of himself voting in Memphis, he was among the most visible individuals potentially facing charges for violating state law.1 The law in Tennessee and 17 other states prohibits voter selfies ...
-
The Law of Public Communication
By Kent R. Middleton, William Eyre Lee" - Lyombe Eko, "University"" of Iowa" " " "I appreciate that this book is trying to buck the standard trend of topic areas by moving content into more theoretical or 'principle' chapters." - Genelle Belmas, "California"" State - Fullerton"
-
Mass Communication Law in a Nutshell
By T. Barton Carter, Juliet Lushbough Dee, Harvey L. ZuckmanA grand jury indicted Pentagon employee Linda Tripp on two felony counts in 1999 for taping telephone conversations with Monica Lewinsky about Lewinsky's relationship with President Bill Clinton . Although Tripp's lawyer had advised her ...
-
Mass Communication: Living in a Media World
By Ralph E. HansonIn every chapter of this bestselling text, students will explore the latest developments and current events that are rapidly changing the media landscape.
-
Social Media and the Law: A Guidebook for Communication Students and Professionals
By Daxton StewartIncluding two new chapters that examine First Amendment issues and ownership of social media accounts and content, Social Media and the Law brings together thirteen media law scholars to address these questions and more, including current ...
-
The Law of Public Communication
By Kent Middleton, Bill F. ChamberlinThe Law of Public Communication
-
The Law of Public Communication
By Kent Middleton, William Eyre LeeFocusing on the implications of the law for practitioners, this annually updated text examines legal issues affecting journalism, political and commercial speech, and electronic media. The 2006 Edition of this...
-
Deciding Communication Law: Key Cases in Context
By Susan Dente RossStrickland, 420 U.S. 308, 326 (1975); Epperson v. ... purpose that the First Amendment is so “directly and sharply implicate[d],” ibid, as to require judicial intervention to protect students' constitutional rights.7 [274] III.