A major revision of our understanding of long-range bombing, this book examines how Anglo-American ideas about "strategic" bombing were formed and implemented. It argues that ideas about bombing civilian targets rested on--and gained validity from--widespread but substantially erroneous assumptions about the nature of modern industrial societies and their vulnerability to aerial bombardment. These assumptions were derived from the social and political context of the day and were maintained largely through cognitive error and bias. Tami Davis Biddle explains how air theorists, and those influenced by them, came to believe that strategic bombing would be an especially effective coercive tool and how they responded when their assumptions were challenged. Biddle analyzes how a particular interpretation of the World War I experience, together with airmen's organizational interests, shaped interwar debates about strategic bombing and preserved conceptions of its potentially revolutionary character. This flawed interpretation as well as a failure to anticipate implementation problems were revealed as World War II commenced. By then, the British and Americans had invested heavily in strategic bombing. They saw little choice but to try to solve the problems in real time and make long-range bombing as effective as possible. Combining narrative with analysis, this book presents the first-ever comparative history of British and American strategic bombing from its origins through 1945. In examining the ideas and rhetoric on which strategic bombing depended, it offers critical insights into the validity and robustness of those ideas--not only as they applied to World War II but as they apply to contemporary warfare.
"--Robert Jervis, Columbia University "This book is a broad overview of a very important subject. Biddle's goal is to make sense of the big picture, and this is precisely what she succeeds in doing. Her judgments are honest and fair.
In 1940, native West Texan Roy H. Elrod joined the Marine Corps.
This comparative account of civilian experiences of aerial bombing in World War II Britain and Japan reveals the universality of total war.
Frank Ledwidge offers a sweeping global history of air warfare, introducing the major battles, crises, and controversies where air power has taken centre stage.Ae
While these are important analyses, there is no one complete study of the idea behind America’s vision of strategy bombing that answers: how it originated, why it changed over time, the factors that shaped change, and how technology ...
This book examines how American fighter planes and heavy bombers played a pivotal role in the Allies' successful ground campaigns in North Africa during World War II.
... 46–47 B Company, 2/18th Infantry, 47 Beaulier, Jerry, 147 Berlin airlift, 50 beyond-visual-range (BVR) missiles, 141, 143–44, 150, 212n5 Bien Hoa Air Base, 12, 18, 20, 33 Binh Thuy Air Base, 20 Blesse, Frederick “Boots,” 146 Blight, ...
Many writers attempted to provide manuals to help improve debating skills, but it was not until Aristotle produced The Art of Rhetoric in the 4th century bc that the subject had a true masterpiece.
RAND (in a study led by Albert Wohlstetter) quantified the problem in terms of maximum “safe occupancy time” hours, between when bombers could arrive at overseas bases and Soviet aircraft could attack them. Aircraft at UK bases could ...
In this monograph, Tami Davis Biddle analyzes the historical record of air power over the past 100 years.