Democracy is not naturally plausible. Why turn such important matters over to masses of people who have no expertise? Many theories of democracy answer by appealing to the intrinsic value of democratic procedure, leaving aside whether it makes good decisions. In Democratic Authority, David Estlund offers a groundbreaking alternative based on the idea that democratic authority and legitimacy must depend partly on democracy's tendency to make good decisions. Just as with verdicts in jury trials, Estlund argues, the authority and legitimacy of a political decision does not depend on the particular decision being good or correct. But the "epistemic value" of the procedure--the degree to which it can generally be accepted as tending toward a good decision--is nevertheless crucial. Yet if good decisions were all that mattered, one might wonder why those who know best shouldn't simply rule. Estlund's theory--which he calls "epistemic proceduralism"--avoids epistocracy, or the rule of those who know. He argues that while some few people probably do know best, this can be used in political justification only if their expertise is acceptable from all reasonable points of view. If we seek the best epistemic arrangement in this respect, it will be recognizably democratic--with laws and policies actually authorized by the people subject to them.
This book provides a philosophical account of the moral foundations of democracy and of liberalism.
This book debates the nature and functions of authority: it examines how far our inherited images of authority derive from an aristocratic and traditional order and considers which models of authority are still relevant in a democratic and ...
Democratic Authority at Century's End
... 169 subjectivity 64, 118 subsidiarity 41, 43 sustainable development 169 suzerainty 92–3, 95, 112, 210n3 symbiotici 41 Talleyrand, Charles Maurice de 129 Taylor, Charles (Liberian president) 162 territory/territoriality 30, 96, ...
This book articulates principles that enable secular governments to protect liberty in a way that judiciously separates church and state and fully respects religious citizens.
Drawing on critical episodes in U.S. history, Piven shows that it is in fact precisely at those seismic moments when people act outside of political norms that they become empowered to their full democratic potential.
These editions preserve the original texts of these important books while presenting them in durable paperback and hardcover editions.
"--John W. Gardner (on the first edition) In this classic book, one of the world's most distinguished political scientists discusses the problems, strengths, and weaknesses of democracy as a method of decision making for modern governments.
Namnyak, M., N. Tufton, R. Szekely, M. Toal, S. Worboys, and E. L. Sampson. 2008. '“Stockholm Syndrome”: Psychiatric Diagnosis or Urban Myth?' Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 117: 4–11. Narveson, Jan. 1988. The Libertarian Idea.
... Freeman Butts Donald L. Clark John F. Cooke Jane A. Couch Thomas A. Craven Lawrence W. Crispo H. David Fish C. Hugh Friedman Ruth M. Gadebusch Susan Hone Richard Ibanez Napoleon Jones , Jr. William L. Lucas Stephen P. McCall Joseph ...