Seventeenth-century England was a country obsessed with property rights. For only those who owned property were considered to have a vested interest in the maintenance of law, order and social harmony. As such, establishing the ownership of 'things' was a constant concern for all people, and nowhere is this more evident than in the cases of disputed wills. Based on a wealth of surviving evidence from the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, the probate jurisdiction which probated wills of the more wealthy English property owners as well as some of those with a more modest quantity of property, this book investigates what litigation over the validity of wills reveals about the interplay between society and law. The volume investigates, catalogs, and systematizes the legal issues that were raised in will disputes in the Canterbury Court in the last half of the seventeenth century. However, this is not just a book about law and legal practice. The records from which it draws plunge us into deeply personal and often tragic situations, revealing how the last requests of the dead and dying were often ignored or misinterpreted by family, friends and creditors for their own benefit. By focusing on property law as reflected in cases of disputed wills, the book provides a glimpse at a much fuller spectrum of society than is often the case. Even people of relatively modest means were concerned to pass on their possessions, and their cases provide a snapshot of the type of objects owned and social relationships revealed by patterns of bequests. This too is true for women, who despite being denied full participation in many areas of civic life, are frequently encountered as key players in court cases over disputed wills. What emerges from this study is a picture of a society for which notions of law and private property were increasingly intertwined, yet in which courts were less concerned with formality than with ensuring that the intentions of will-makers were properly carried out.
In practice, the choice fell to the bishop's consistory courts, and ordinarily this process required at least 19 L Bonfield, Devising, Dying and Dispute: Probate Litigation in Early Modern England the possibility of continued ...
By tracing the largely forgotten eighteenth-century migration of elite mixed-race individuals from Jamaica to Great Britain, Children of Uncertain Fortune reinterprets the evolution of British racial ideologies as a matter of negotiating ...
For alternative accounts of Renaissance death culture placing different emphases on the transition from ... link between wills and the deathbed, see Lloyd Bonfield, Devising, Dying, and Dispute (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2012), 22–25.
61 See Bonfield, Devising, Dying and Dispute, p. 73. 62 E.g. Sutton c. Smith (Prerogative Court 1753), 1 Lee 274,279, 161 Eng. Rep. 102,104 (“[A] will in writing shall not be repealed by words alone”); Richards c.
Their estates also fell to the pope.370 The curia distinguished two categories of 'officiales', as can be seen from their ... See the criticism by Andreas Meyer of Daniel Williman, The Right of Spoil of the Popes of Avignon 1316–1415 ...
Several studies demonstrate that disputed marriages and legitimacy claims generated considerable litigation in the sixteenth ... 21–2 , 29-30 ; Lloyd Bonfield , Devising , Dying and Dispute : Probate Litigation in Early Modern England ...
Lloyd Bonfield, Devising, Dying and Dispute. Probate Litigation in Early Modern England (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012), p. 11. See Caroline Arni and Mischa Suter, “Editorial,” Historische Anthropologie 24–3 (2016), pp. 309–12, here p.
From what is known about early modern probate litigation , such cases mostly involved disputes over nuncupative wills , the mental capacity of testators , and the undue influence ... See : Lloyd Bonfield , Devising , Dying and Dispute .
But long before Ellen's death , Ralph had another wife . ... Nicholas Parker had died in 1533 , and Elizabeth lived at Horrocksford with her mother ( another Elizabeth ) . ... Bonfield , Devising , Dying and Dispute , pp .
4 Elizabeth and William Death had at least three children who died in infancy. They were Judith (c.1638–d.1639), ... 23; Lloyd Bonfield, Devising, Dying and Dispute Probate Litigation in Early Modern England (Aldershot, 2012), pp.