Evidence: The Objection Method

ISBN-10
1422495388
ISBN-13
9781422495384
Series
Evidence
Category
Evidence (Law)
Pages
1313
Language
English
Published
2011
Author
Dennis D. Prater

Description

Evidence: The Objection Method is a stimulating casebook that presents the study of evidence the context of a trial. This new Fourth Edition was necessitated by a major development in the law of evidence. The Evidence Rules Restyling Project changed the text of every single one of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The Restyled Rules are set forth in full in an Introduction to the book - in side-by-side form, old and new - together with committee notes. Particular Restyled Rules are also set forth individually where pertinent to the topic discussed in the book. Co-author Daniel Capra, serves as Reporter to the Judicial Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules and had front-line responsibility for the restyled rules. Another co-author, Stephen Saltzburg, served as a consultant on the Restyling project. Where possible, the drafters' perspective on the Restyling amendments has been emphasized. So for example, the Introduction contains an explanation of the Restyling project prepared by Professor Capra. Of course, the principal cases in the book were decided before the Restyled Rules of Evidence went into effect. Where those cases quote the language of the rule, the authors indicate that the quotation is from the rule before it was restyled. Editorial comments concerning restyling are contained in brackets in the cases. This new Fourth Edition continues the practice of the previous edition by including extensive excerpts from the Federal Rules of Evidence Manual, coauthored by Professors Saltzburg, Capra and Michael Martin. This new edition also plays to the strengths of the first three editions. Most importantly, it provides transcript style problems in which lawyers present evidence and argue evidentiary points, and a trial judge is called on to rule. These problems have been updated and amplified in this edition to provide a real challenge for students seeking to master the rules of evidence as well as the art of objection and argum

Other editions

Similar books

  • Evidence Concentrate: Law Revision and Study Guide
    By Maureen Spencer, John Spencer

    R v Campbell (2007) FACTS: The defendant was charged with false imprisonment and assault against a woman with whom he had a sexual relationship. The prosecution was permitted to adduce evidence of recent crimes of violence against ...

  • Evidence
    By Andrew Choo

    An illustration of the application of section 74(1) may be found in R v Robertson. Robertson was charged with conspiring with Poole and Long to commit burglaries. Poole and Long pleaded guilty to relevant substantive counts of burglary, ...

  • Evidence: Cases, Commentary, and Problems
    By David Alan Sklansky, Andrea Roth

    He argued that Officer Moore was mistaking him for a man named David Bailey, with whom he was playing dice around the time of the sale. Mr. Copelin and his corroborating witnesses testified that they had seen Mr. Bailey repeatedly leave ...

  • An Analytical Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, and Cases
    By Ronald Jay Allen, Alex Stein, David S. Schwartz

    Hallmark features of An Analytical Approach to Evidence: Text, Problems, and Cases: An opening transcript from an actual criminal law case illustrates how evidence is admitted and excluded in practice--Chapter Two on the trial process can ...

  • Texas Rules of Evidence Manual - Tenth Edition
    By David A. Schlueter, Jonathan D. Schlueter

    In Powell v. State,266 the accused was charged with indecency with a child. The prosecution introduced testimony from six witnesses to the effect that they too had been victims of the accused's acts, on the argument that the evidence of ...

  • The New Wigmore: A Treatise on Evidence : Impeachment and Rehabilitation

    Lowery , 6.9 n.255 Turner v . Safley , 5.3 n.267 ; 6.2 n.262 6.12 nn.26 , 169 , 195 , 263 , 430 Tornay v . United States , 6.7 nn.77,96 Torres v . INS , 5.4 n.51 Torres v . Kuzniasz , 6.12 nn.272 , 276 Torres v .

  • Evidence: Text, Rules, Illustrations, and Problems : the Commentary Method
    By Michael H. Graham

    As the prosecution points out , Sullivan's direct testimony raised the issue of his credibility to the jury . Sullivan's credibility was in fact the central issue litigated in the case , as the defense presented only Sullivan and the ...

  • Maryland Evidence Handbook
    By Joseph F. Murphy, Erin Catherine Murphy

    Maryland Evidence Handbook

  • Maryland Evidence Handbook
    By Joseph F. Murphy, Erin Catherine Murphy

    Maryland Evidence Handbook

  • Evidence of Opinion and Expert Evidence
    By Great Britain. Law Reform Committee, Stationery Office, The

    Evidence of Opinion and Expert Evidence