Many students develop misinformed opinions about the American electoral process. Conventional Wisdom and American Elections: Exploding Myths and Misconceptions debunks some of the more common misunderstandings that have arisen about the electoral process in the past few decades. This book engages students in elections and politics and teaches them to evaluate information like a political scientist. The third edition looks forward to the 2016 election with new, more contemporary myths addressed and a new chapter on voter fraud and identification.
This book examines whether the 2016 presidential election challenged conventional wisdom in political science or strengthened current theories.
Fournier, Ron, Douglas Sosnick, and Matthew Dowd. 2006. Applebee's America. New York: Simon and Schuster. Frank, Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan.
Kallina examines the facts and myths surrounding the 1960 Presidential election in his exploration of one of the closest Presidential races in American history.
Williams, Hal R. Years of Decision: American Politics in the 1890s. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1978. Williams, R. L. “A Note on Robust Variance Estimation for Cluster- Correlated Data.” Biometrics 56 (2000): 645–646.
Concise yet comprehensive, The American Vice Presidency is the fullest and most accurate examination of the office of the vice president to date, covering the origins and constitutional roots of the institution, its history, and the slow ...
What is wrong with American political campaigns? How could the campaign process be improved? This volume brings the expertise of leading political scientists to the public debate about campaign reform.
In the end, When Does Gender Matter? shows that women candidates win as often as do men and that partisan concerns trump gender every time.
Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections W. Joseph Campbell ... Six days after the election, Pearson seemed to grovel; he addressed Truman in his column, writing, “Although I was wrong in predicting your defeat, I am glad that I ...
The votes of even the few electors who are swayed by candidates' personalities usually cancel each other out. As a result, election outcomes are seldom decided by individual candidates' personal images. Occasionally, but not often.
These analyses bring novel empirical techniques to the study of basic normative questions of democratic theory and practice.