The book examines three important research questions against the backdrop of increasing private sector participation in the Indian mining industry. The questions are: i) are private sector mining firms more productive than public sector mining firms? ii) do public sector mining firms comply with environmental regulations better than their private counterparts? and iii) do public sector mining firms perform better in social compliance than the private mining firms? Using firm level data from 1988–89 to 2005–06, the author finds that Total Factor Productivity (TFP) levels of private mining firms are significantly higher than those of public sector firms in three sectors – metallic, non-metallic and coal. In the petroleum sector, private sector firms outperformed the public sector firms in the initial years, while later on, the productivity of public sector firms exceeded that of private firms in a few years. The book examines the environmental performance of public and private mining firms in the context of Indian chromite mining industry using four indicators: namely, overburden management, air pollution, the quality of mine drainage water after treatment, and the quality of ground water. The author constructs a multidimensional environmental defiance index for comparing the aggregate environmental performance across ownership groups and does not find significant differences between the environmental performance of public and private mining firms. Both public and private mining firms have failed to comply with the environmental regulations. The author compares the social compliance of public- and private-sector mining firms by conducting a survey of households who have surrendered their land to the mining firms. It is found that the majority of households were dissatisfied with the compensation paid by both public and private sector mining firms. Furthermore, it is observed that there is no significant difference between the compensations provided by the public and private sector mining firms.
His PhD dissertation examined the performance of public and private mining firms in India in productivity, environmental and social dimensions. He won first prize in the 2008 Global Development Awards and Medals Competition under the ...
There is a significant difference in sustainability reporting practices between public and private companies in India. Sustainability Performance Disclosure and Type of Industry Adoption and implementation of sustainability practices ...
Second, public enterprises and other types of parastatals involved in mining and mineral processing increasingly have large shares of private (and often foreign) capital. In fact, public enterprises have tended to launch new investments ...
This study undertook empirical tests of the efficiency of private versus publicly owned firms in the resource extraction industry (Das, 2012). By assessing the total factor productivity for both private and public mining firms in India ...
Reassessing the role of state-owned enterprises in central, eastern and southeastern Europe (IMF Departmental Papers/Policy Papers19/11). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. State Committee for Statistics. (2018).
The assumption of entrepreneurial role by the governments of the newly independent countries was necessitated by the socio - economic ... In India the expansion of public enterprises was attributed to the constitutional obligation .
standards being less than they would otherwise have been if the public sector had not grown as fast or at all. ... infrastructure and transport, manufacturing, extraction of natural resources like oil and natural gas and mining, ...
This book contains a wealth of information and analysis relating to mineral royalties. Primary information includes royalty legislation from over forty nations.
Rees, R. (1976), Public Enterprise Economics (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson). Renaud, B. (1981), National Urbanisation Policy in Developing Countries (New York: Oxford University Press). Reuber, G. L. (1973), Private Foreign Investment ...
This Toolkit provides non-technical, practical help to enable officials to recognise conflict of interest situations and help them to ensure that integrity and reputation are not compromised.