Two of today's most important and popular New Testament scholars, John Dominic Crossan and N. T. Wright, here air their very different understandings of the historical reality and theological meaning of Jesus' Resurrection. The book highlights points of agreement and disagreement between them and explores the many attendant issues. This book brings two leading lights in Jesus studies together for a long-overdue conversation with one another and with significant scholars from other disciplines.
"This compelling book is the most comprehensive defense of Jesus' resurrection anywhere. If you're interested in knowing the evidence for the resurrection and sharing it with others, then you must read this book!
The Resurrection of Jesus Christ
In this book W. Ross Hastings reveals the hidden depths of the theological significance and ongoing relevance of the resurrection of Jesus Christ for our being, our salvation, Christian life, ethics, and our future hope.
I Believe in the Resurrection of Jesus
... sparks in the stubble . 8They will judge nations , and rule over peoples , and the Lord will be their king for ever . ' Those who trust in him will understand truth , and those who are loyal and faithful will remain with him in love ...
This book provides an original and comprehensive assessment of the hypotheses concerning the origin of resurrection Christology.
Could there be any new and promising approach to the question of the historicity of Jesus' resurrection? Yes, answers Michael Licona.
MIETHE : Let us take John A. T. Robinson , for instance . What moved him from his position earlier in life , obviously a stance that would be much closer to Tony's position , about the critical nature of the text to a position with ...
Edited by Paul Copan and Ronald Tacelli, this is a lively and provocative debate between Christian philosopher William Lane Craig and New Testament scholar and atheist Gerd Lüdemann on the historical truth of the resurrection.
The book ends with a chapter on the Christian's future hope. Professor Marxsen deliberately talks about the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth. In so doing he means to stress that the Risen Christ is identical with the earthly Jesus.