The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice

The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice
ISBN-10
1452281971
ISBN-13
9781452281971
Series
The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication
Category
Communication in the social sciences
Pages
898
Language
English
Published
2013
Authors
John G. Oetzel, Stella Ting-Toomey

Description

This second edition of the award-winning The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication emphasizes constructive conflict management from a communication perspective, identifying the message as the focus of conflict research and practice. Editors John G. Oetzel and Stella Ting-Toomey, along with expert researchers in the discipline, have assembled in one resource the knowledge base of the field of conflict communication; identified the best theories, ideas, and practices of conflict communication; and provided the opportunity for scholars and practitioners to link theoretical frameworks and application tools.

Get the book

Amazon.com
Amazon.com
Search the book
eBay.com
eBay.com
Search the book

Other editions

Similar books

  • Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology
    Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology
    By Michael Billig

    Johns bases her pamphlet upon Ben Klassen's Nature's Eternal Religion , which also asserted that Jews have created Christianity to dupe the masses . Yet having cited Klassen's deeply antisemitic arguments as the authoritative source for ...

  • Writing with Sweet Clarity
    Writing with Sweet Clarity
    By John E. Eck

    In this book, criminologist and experienced educator John Eck draws on decades of academic and professional writing experience to provide an analytical toolkit for clear professional writing.

  • Learn to Write Badly: How to Succeed in the Social Sciences
    By Michael Billig

    And which linguistic features contribute towards this bad writing? Michael Billig's witty and entertaining book analyses these questions in a quest to pinpoint exactly what is going wrong with the way social scientists write.