Relied on by students, professors, and practitioners, Erwin Chemerinsky's popular treatise, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies, Fifth Edition, clearly states the law and identifies the underlying policy issues in each area of constitutional law.
Introduction: Putting the people back in "We the people" / Michael C. Dorf -- The story of Marbury v. Madison: making defeat look like victory / Michael W. McConnell --...
D. OPTIONAL READINGS Procedural Due Process The following sources present the topics covered in this chapter in more depth than the chapter introduction. ... Michael C. Dorf & Trevor W. Morrison, Constitutional Law (2010) , chapter 8.
The combination of text and cases creates flexibility in structuring class time. Constitutional Law for Criminal Justice makes complex concepts accessible to students in all levels of criminal justice education.
The authors have made this edition more user friendly than the fourth edition and have created an accompanying teacher¿s manual.
Discusses and analyzes the concepts of constitutional law using Supreme Court cases and other legislative actions, covering such topics as the powers of each government branch, civil liberties, the dormant commerce clause, and fundamental ...
Constitutional Law - I: Structure
" This Twelfth Edition incorporates many changes in Constitutional law, including limiting federal courts' power to review partisan state gerrymanders, limits on government-compelled speech, refusing to give the President immunity from ...
This introduction to American constitutional law critically examines the work of the Supreme Court of the United States, which has resolved thousands of constitutional controversies based on the shortest national constitution on the planet.
This book provides a basic understanding of Constitutional law, addressing both the history of the U.S. Constitution and each of its individual clauses.
The short-term impact of Perry was that it did not resolve one of the biggest constitutional questions in recent memory—whether states can prohibit the marriage of same-sex couples—because the appealing party lacked standing.