Almost all US cities are controlled by real estate and development interests, but Santa Cruz, California, is a deviant case. An unusual coalition of socialist-feminists, environmentalists, social-welfare liberals, and neighborhood activists has stopped every growth project proposed by landowners and developers since 1969, and controlled the city council since 1981. Even after a 1989 earthquake forced the city to rebuild its entire downtown, the progressive elected officials prevailed over developers and landowners. Drawing on hundreds of primary documents, as well as original, previously unpublished interviews, The Leftmost City utilizes an extended case study of Santa Cruz to critique three major theories of urban power; Marxism, public-choice theory, and regime theory. Santa Cruz is presented within the context of other progressive attempts to shape city government, and the authors findings support growth-coalition theory, which stresses the conflict between real estate interests and neighborhoods as the fundamental axis of urban politics. The authors conclude their analysis by applying insights gleaned from Santa Cruz to progressive movements nationwide, offering a template for progressive coalitions to effectively organize to achieve political power.
The Myth of Liberal Ascendancy: Corporate Dominance from the Great Depression to the Great Recession
It is commonly accepted that America saw the rise of liberalism in the wake of the New Deal, especially during the three decades after World War II. Based on new archival research, G. William Domhoff reveals this period instead as one of ...
This book critiques and extends the analysis of power in the classic, Who Rules America?, on the fiftieth anniversary of its original publication in 1967--and through its subsequent editions.
... president, Remington Rand, and a leader in the National Association of Manufacturers • Malcolm C. Rorty, ... New York City • David L. Podell, a lawyer who specialized in work for trade associations • Senator Robert La Follette Jr., ...
The liberal Hatfield version and the more cautious Wagner version were eventually reconciled, so Congress passed the Wagner-Hatfield bill in 1933, despite strong opposition from railroad executives, (see also Graebner 1980, pp.
Who Rules America Now?: A View for the '80s
New York: Cambridge University Press. Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Evans, Peter and William H. Sewell, Jr. 2013.
More recently, Livingston and Pearce (2009a) used photos of CEOs to look at something psychologists have called “babyfaceness.” A body of research in social psychology has revealed that some adults are seen as “baby-faced,” as opposed ...
Little has been offered in the way of solving urban America's problems, and much of what has been proposed or practiced remains profoundly misguided, in David Imbroscio's view. In Urban America Reconsidered, he offers a timely response.
Drawing on critical episodes in U.S. history, Piven shows that it is in fact precisely at those seismic moments when people act outside of political norms that they become empowered to their full democratic potential.