The Ontario Municipal Board attracted power from the time it was formed in June 1906 to adjudicate and supervise the provincial railway sector and certain municipal financial activity. Since the 1930s and '40s, successive governments came to rely more and more on the OMB to oversee and adjudicate planning decisions and most financial undertakings of Ontario municipalities as well as exercise authority under a large and diverse range of statutes, estimated to number about 180 at its peak. For several years, the members of the Board each had to take his turn in the 1930s and early '40s acting as the quasi-minister of municipal affairs before the ministry was formed. Since 1981, the OMB became an appellate tribunal with original authority to hear and adjudicate all contentious matters under the Expropriations Act and all appeals arising from municipal councils and planning applications to councils' refusal to make decisions. You will read about loaded situations that seemed without solution peaceably, where two or three members of this Board would convene in the local arena or a church auditorium or the Army-Navy-Air Force meeting room in the locality where the dispute arose. Afterward, the Board gave them a reasoned solution to which all those interested had contributed publicly and openly. This book tells the story of the OMB from its founding in 1906 to now, in its apparent last days before replacement by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. The author's conclusions as to what has happened to this Board, and why, are a shocking comment on the course of decision-making in the public sector in the 21st century and how it may affect you next week or next year. Revised 2nd Edition...
Vorläufiger Rechtsschutz im verwaltungsgerichtlichen Verfahren unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Europarechts
Administrative Law
As Vanderbilt points out in his introduction, this is an important field that involves much more than administrative procedure.
This report examines administrative tribunals that resolve disputes arising in the work place in Ontario as a context within which to consider more general issues relating to the reform of administrative law.
This book provides an authoritative combination of legal and administrative practice and procedure and the operation of mental health tribunals (MHRTs).
Ne demek istediğimi somut bir örnek üzerinden göstereyim: Türk doktrininde ilk defa ben “yokluk” kavramını ikiye ayırdım ve bunlara ayrı isimler verip inceledim (Gözler, Đdare Hukuku, op. cit., 2003, c.I, s.879-890). Yine ilk defa ben, ...
William Penniman Would like to acknowledge David Moody, Bee Bentley and Paul Forshay of Sutherland, Asbill & Brennan for their assistance. [v/vi] INTRODUCTION This book sets out to teach administrative law.
Annual Report: 2006/2007
The book before carries a broad title. In the Dutch literature, the terms lawfinding and lawmaking are often used interchangeably.
Betr. u. a. den bernischen Verwaltungsprozess und das bernische Baubeschwerdeverfahren.