In her study of newly recovered works by British women, Kathryn Freeman traces the literary relationship between women writers and the Asiatic Society of Bengal, otherwise known as the Orientalists. Distinct from their male counterparts of the Romantic period, who tended to mirror the Orientalist distortions of India, women writers like Phebe Gibbes, Elizabeth Hamilton, Sydney Owenson, Mariana Starke, Eliza Fay, Anna Jones, and Maria Jane Jewsbury interrogated these distortions from the foundation of gender. Freeman takes a three-pronged approach, arguing first that in spite of their marked differences, female authors shared a common resistance to the Orientalists’ intellectual genealogy that allowed them to represent Vedic non-dualism as an alternative subjectivity to the masculine model of European materialist philosophy. She also examines the relationship between gender and epistemology, showing that women’s texts not only shift authority to a feminized subjectivity, but also challenge the recurring Orientalist denigration of Hindu masculinity as effeminate. Finally, Freeman contrasts the shared concern about miscegenation between Orientalists and women writers, contending that the first group betrays anxiety about intermarriage between East Indian Company men and indigenous women while the varying portrayals of intermarriage by women show them poised to dissolve the racial and social boundaries. Her study invites us to rethink the Romantic paradigm of canonical writers as replicators of Orientalists’ cultural imperialism in favor of a more complicated stance that accommodates the differences between male and female authors with respect to India.
Tracing the literary relationship between British women and the Asiatic Society of Bengal, Kathryn Freeman argues that women writers, distinct from their male counterparts, interrogated Orientalist distortions of India through the lens of ...
From U.C. Irvine, I thank my dissertation committee for their indefatigable support and guidance: Hugh Roberts, Robert Folkenflik, ... those conversations have been invaluable: David Alworth, Homi Bhabha, Stephen Burt, Amanda Claybaugh, ...
Khan,”. and. “To. Coleridge”. This chapter thus views Robinson and Coleridge through the lens of their artistically productive confluences that challenge the divorce of gender and epistemology. As the following explorations of poetic ...
I am also grateful to Wolfram Schmidgen , Fiona Robertson , Nigel Leask , Ronald Judy , and Michael Hardt for their comments on particular chapters . Marilyn Butler and James Chandler , the editors of this series , and Josie Dixon ...
... Comments 1762.03.28 0.400 740.000 Grill & Grubb junk bottomry 1767.00.00 0.170 2,516.000 Grill & Grubb? 1764-05.18 0.150 3,000.000 Grill & Grubb 1764-12.01 0.150 3,000.000 450.000 Grill & Grubb 1765.01.28? 0.200 1,258.000 Chambers ...
In engaging with the work and thought of Coleridge, Poe, Hoffmann, Mary Shelley, and other Romantic luminaries, the contributors to this collection open new methodological approaches to understanding human interaction with technology that ...
Establishes Blake's controversial, unfinished epic, The Four Zoas, as the culmination of his mythos.
"This new edition of an influential American classic--one of the first books in twentieth-century popular literature to grapple with issues of gender and race--is reason enough to celebrate, but Daniel Itzkovitz's splendid and insightful ...
Recounting these and similar anecdotes in order to make claims about Goethe's position in literary history is a ... As Ernst Behler's more recent article on 'Romantik' in the Goethe Handbuch demonstrates, this position is now hardly ...
This book has been considered by academicians and scholars of great significance and value to literature.