How the United States can provide equal educational opportunity to every child The United States Supreme Court closed the courthouse door to federal litigation to narrow educational funding and opportunity gaps in schools when it ruled in San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez in 1973 that the Constitution does not guarantee a right to education. Rodriguez pushed reformers back to the state courts where they have had some success in securing reforms to school funding systems through education and equal protection clauses in state constitutions, but far less success in changing the basic structure of school funding in ways that would ensure access to equitable and adequate funding for schools. Given the limitations of state school funding litigation, education reformers continue to seek new avenues to remedy inequitable disparities in educational opportunity and achievement, including recently returning to federal court. This book is the first comprehensive examination of three issues regarding a federal right to education: why federal intervention is needed to close educational opportunity and achievement gaps; the constitutional and statutory legal avenues that could be employed to guarantee a federal right to education; and, the scope of what a federal right to education should guarantee. A Federal Right to Education provides a timely and thoughtful analysis of how the United States could fulfill its unmet promise to provide equal educational opportunity and the American Dream to every child, regardless of race, class, language proficiency, or neighborhood.
Available at http://www.progressive.org/mag_zinn1105 . 10. National Labor Relations Act , Section 1 . 11. NLRB v . Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. , 301 U.S. 1 , 33 ( 1937 ) .2 . 12. See Laurence H. Tribe , American Constitutional Law 776 ...
AMERICAN GOVERNMENT / EDUCATION “ Neal P. McCluskey shows how Washington politicians — representing bureaucrats and unions rather than parents and students — wrested control of public schools from local communities .
Pearson v. Murray, 182 A. 590, 592 (1936) (quoting Clark v. Maryland Inst., 87 Md. 643 (1898)). 9. Pearson, 182 A. at 594. 10. State of Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337, 345 (1938). 11. Ibid., 349–50. 12. Ibid. 13.
The Schools, the Courts, and the Public Interest
Driver provides a fresh account of the historic legal battles, and argues that since the 1970s the Supreme Court has transformed public schools into Constitution-free zones.
This book provides a comprehensive description of the federal government's relationship with higher education and how that relationship became so expansive and indispensable over time.
Maria M. Lewis is Assistant Professor of Education in the Department of Education Policy Studies at the Pennsylvania State University and Faculty Affiliate at Penn State Law. Her research examines issues at the intersection of education ...
Sections include: a primer for privacy; summary of key federal laws; protecting the privacy of individuals during the data collection process; securing the privacy of data maintained & used within an agency; providing parents access to ...
In Richard D. Kahlenberg , ed . , A Notion at Risk : Preserving Public Education as an Engine of Social Mobility . New York , N.Y .: Century Foundation Press . Rothstein , Richard . 2002. “ States Teeter When Balancing Standards With ...
Starting with racial desegregation, the push for equality expanded to gender equity, education rights for children with disabilities, bilingual and bi-cultural programs for Englishlanguage-learners, school finance reform, and even equal ...