1. Bundled Payment: Effects on Health Care Spending and Quality: Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science...

ISBN-10: 1483925676
ISBN-13: 9781483925677
Category: Medical
Pages: 156
Language: English
Published: 2013-03-21
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
Authors: Department of Health and Human Services, U. S. Department Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Description

This review is part of the Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of the Science series, which aims to provide critical analysis of the existing literature on quality improvement strategies for a selection of diseases and practices. The review focuses on “bundled payment,” a strategy for health care quality improvement and cost containment. This strategy has been the subject of increasing interest, with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announcing a large national bundled payment initiative in August 2011. Other reviews in the series will address a range of quality improvement topics arising from portfolios (areas of research) of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). We define “bundled payment” as a method in which payments to health care providers are related to the predetermined expected costs of a grouping, or “bundle,” of related health care services. In contrast, fee-for-service payment typically involves payments for individual services, while capitation involves a single per capita prospective payment for all services over a fixed period of time, regardless of the number of services or episodes of care provided within that period. Within the bundled payment model, a variety of specific payment methods are possible. Bundles may be defined in different ways, covering varying periods of time and including single or multiple health care providers of different types. In addition, given the diversity and complexity of the U.S. health care delivery system, bundled payment programs may be implemented in a variety of contexts that may influence their effects on spending and quality. Bundled payment should create a financial incentive for providers to reduce the number and cost of services contained in the bundle. Providers are typically given discretion over the allocation of the services used to treat the patient's episode most effectively. This flexibility may encourage providers to use resources to coordinate care; often, these services are not reimbursed under fee-for-service payment. If the bundle includes services delivered by multiple providers in multiple settings, providers have to create a mechanism for managing the shared payment for a given treatment or condition, which could also foster coordination. Several types of undesired effects of bundled payment have also been postulated. The most significant potential undesired effects include underuse of effective services within the bundle, avoidance of high-risk patients, and an increase in the number of bundles reimbursed (increasing health spending). Providers under bundled payment may “game” the system by changing coding practices to maximize reimbursement for the bundle (“upcoding”) or by moving services in time or location to qualify for separate reimbursement (“unbundling”). This review was designed to address the uncertainties about the effects of bundled payment on spending and quality measures. It should help readers (1) understand what the evidence shows about the effects of bundled payment on health care spending and quality of care, and (2) understand key design and contextual features of bundled payment programs and their association with bundled payment effects. The review addressed three Key Questions: 1. What does the evidence show on the effects of bundled payment versus usual (predominantly fee-for-service) payment on health care spending and quality measures? 2. Does the evidence show differences in the effects of bundled payment systems by key design features? 3. Does the evidence show differences in the effects of bundled payment systems by key contextual factors?

Get the book

Similar books

Variation in Health Care Spending: Target Decision Making, Not Geography
By Institute of Medicine, Board on Health Care Services, Committee on Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending and Promotion of High-Value Care
Medicare payment reform has the potential to improve health, promote efficiency in the U.S. health care system, and reorient competition in the health care market around the value of services rather than the volume of services provided.
The Healthcare Imperative: Lowering Costs and Improving Outcomes: Workshop Series Summary
By Institute of Medicine, Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine
The book is an excellent guide for policymakers at all levels of government, as well as private sector healthcare workers.
OECD Health Policy Studies Better Ways to Pay for Health Care
By OECD
the achievement of targets relating to preventive care and the management of chronic diseases, less often for the uptake of IT initiatives, patient satisfaction or efficient care provision (e.g. share of generic medicines prescribed).
Handbook Integrated Care
By Ellen Nolte, Volker Amelung, Viktoria Stein
This handbook gives profound insight into the main ideas and concepts of integrated care.
Medicare for All: A Citizen's Guide
By Abdul El-Sayed, Micah Johnson
More importantly, is it practical or practicable? This book goes beyond partisan talking points to offer a serious examination of how Medicare for All would transform the way we give, receive, and pay for healthcare in America.
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
By Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America
This book recommends a sweeping redesign of the American health care system and provides overarching principles for specific direction for policymakers, health care leaders, clinicians, regulators, purchasers, and others.
Free for All?: Lessons from the Rand Health Insurance Experiment
By Joseph P. Newhouse, Rand Corporation. Insurance Experiment Group
This book collects in one place for the first time results previously dispersed through many journals over many years.
Health-Care Utilization as a Proxy in Disability Determination
By Board on Health Care Services, Health and Medicine Division, Engineering
Health Care Utilization as a Proxy in Disability Determination identifies types of utilizations that might be good proxies for "listing-level" severity; that is, what represents an impairment, or combination of impairments, that are severe ...
EBOOK: Purchasing to Improve Health Systems Performance
By Josep Figueras, Ray Robinson, Elke Jakubowski
Berwick, D.M. (2001) Not again! Preventing errors lies in redesign, not exhortation. British Medical Journal, 322: 247–248. Burgers, J.S. et al. (2003) Characteristics of high quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines ...
Long-Term Care Services in the United States, 2013 Overview
By National Center for Health Statistics
This report presents descriptive results from the first wave of the National Study of Long-Term Care Providers (NSLTCP), which was conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Preventions National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS).